Select to expand quote
tarquin1 said..
..... They are expecting 500 000 cases a day next week.
So in 120 days then 100% of people will have had it.
But given google tells me over 11 million already had it in France then say 90 days from now and 100% of people will have had it once and so.... why bother with any excessively restrictive control measures after that ?
The initial covid modelling I recall from March 2020 was an anticipated 81% (I recall 81% because 81% was such an accurate number, not 'around 80%' or 'about three quarters' but '81%') of the population to catch it no matter what - and so the response was supposed to be to spread that 81% over a long enough time period for the medical system to cope.
Seems to me that in Aus, by having this state-premier dick-waving competition about who has the lowest number in the morning press conference for the last two years and trying to have zero cases no matter what else, then all that will happened is what tarquin1 says France now has - the curve was made so flat it is now going to be a near vertical bell curve for the 80%.
The longer WA delays and suppresses I suspect the steeper the bell curve will be.
And thus the dumb-arse policies will deliver the exact thing that the original, but now abandoned for no good reason policies sought to achieve - a very steep curve totaling 80% with and overwhelmed medical system.
Thought-out and Agreed Plan A : 90 days of suppression and then spread infection of 80% over two years to not overwhelm the system
Political dick-waving Plan Delivered : Two years of suppression followed by 90 days for 80% to get it overwhelming the system