i am open to any metrics what is a successful covid response in general, balancing public health with other societal outcomes - but you need to define what that is to measure and compare it.
Deaths and cases are a pretty good metric of the effectiveness of the public health response, because thats sort of the whole point. if more of your population are dying proportionally than others, you're not successful, whatever the underlying factors are.
if the metric is that Florida have had very few restrictions, well we have had less lockdowns and less mandated mask wearing in WA than in Florida. And less cases. So why is Florida the best response?
i'm not bashing Florida (although i am not a fan of the place!), the start of this debate was around people saying Florida had a great response, and I don't think it did on any metric. Happy to listen to arguments as to why it was better, but it seems to be a statement rather than a consideration.
if there was one better response, everyone would have followed it- different states/countries had different start points and experiences and none of them have been that effective as to be the be-all and end-all.
www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19/22456544/covid-19-mask-mandates-lockdown-debate-evidence