Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..

FormulaNova said..
Thanks. When I search for 'nurses wearing checked outfits' on Youtube I get very different results.

The nurse wearing the checkered shirt knows a shiit load more about medicine than you, so by mocking his knowledge you are acknowledging you are a complete retard in comparison.

I think your comprehension skills are letting you down again and you are reading what you want to read.

If I were trying to mock anyone it was you. For posting videos mindlessly that have no commentary from you, to me it appears you really don't know what you are saying, or more correctly what Nurse Campbell is saying, so you just post up a video. PM33 does it all the time and I get the feeling most of the time that he is just forwarding them on, without watching them or understanding them.

I have the youtube video running in the background and it sounds like waffle. You may as well have him reading the soccer results or the weather report. I am not sure there is a point to the video but fear I will fall asleep before he gets to it if there is one.

The point of his video is to pander to his audience to garner more clicks.

He is a victim of audience capture, his early pandemic videos were rather supportive of NPI and vaccines for pandemic response. But as soon as he posted saying he didn't fully endorse a policy, his channel exploded.
The more he pushed the "Vaccines bad but COVID not" message the more money he makes.

People just gobble his crap up, like how he lied about the vaccine causing his high blood pressure.
He was already on blood pressure meds before the pandemic

So we're talking about how much money Dr Campbell made because of Covid are we? Whatever money Campbell makes from his YouTube channel pales in comparison to the entities that were pushing jabs. We're talking 100s of billions of $$. You guys are cooked.

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
So we're talking about how much money Dr Campbell made because of Covid are we? Whatever money Campbell makes from his YouTube channel pales in comparison to the entities that were pushing jabs. We're talking 100s of billions of $$. You guys are cooked.

Nurse Campbell

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
Nurse Campbell

Sorry mate, you're misguided. Anybody with a PhD is referred to as a Dr.

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
Sorry mate, you're misguided. Anybody with a PhD is referred to as a Dr.

You might want to update his Wikipedia entry

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..

Flying Dutchman said..
Sorry mate, you're misguided. Anybody with a PhD is referred to as a Dr.

You might want to update his Wikipedia entry

Rather than deflect your mistake, be a man and own up to it. Don't blame Wikipedia.

"Several countries have experienced excess mortality since the COVID-19 pandemic. This is likely due to many factors, such as COVID-19 itself, and the strain that the pandemic placed on healthcare systems. However, an analysis of excess mortality over the entire period since the onset of vaccination shows that countries with the highest vaccination rates are the countries with the lowest excess mortality. Data that also accounts for the vaccination status of people who died showed that vaccination doesn't cause excess mortality."

healthfeedback.org/claimreview/covid19-vaccines-arent-associated-with-increase-excess-deaths-contrary-claim-john-campbell/

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
So we're talking about how much money Dr Campbell made because of Covid are we? Whatever money Campbell makes from his YouTube channel pales in comparison to the entities that were pushing jabs. We're talking 100s of billions of $$. You guys are cooked.

We are talking about the money John Campbell makes because he is getting rich by deliberately spreading dangerous misinformation.

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..

Sorry mate, you're misguided. Anybody with a PhD is referred to as a Dr.

True, unless you are a crazed republican disparaging Jill Biden's doctorate in education.

Select to expand quote

remery said..
We are talking about the money John Campbell makes because he is getting rich by deliberately spreading dangerous misinformation.

You think he deliberately spreads dangerous misinformation? Sounds like a conspiracy theory you are hypothesising.

The only thing that was guaranteed safe and effective was the profits for pharma.

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
You think he deliberately spreads dangerous misinformation? Sounds like a conspiracy theory you are hypothesising.

The last few links you've posted haven't had much credibility.

I think you should apologise to the Seabreeze community.

Select to expand quote

remery said..

Flying Dutchman said..
Sorry mate, you're misguided. Anybody with a PhD is referred to as a Dr.

True, unless you are a crazed republican disparaging Jill Biden's doctorate in education.

Thank you for backing me up.

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
I think you should apologise to the Seabreeze community.

haha

Now Abbott is in on the conversation.

www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/apr/11/tony-abbott-scott-morrison-covid-19-pandemic-response-overreaction-vaccination

Hey, I have asked this before, but does anyone understand the meaning of the phrase '20/20 hindsight'?

I seem to feel there is a lot of it around at the moment.

You can be a nurse and a Dr at the same time.

Tony Abbott? Who would listen to his impartial advice? All he can do is tear other people down but when he actually needs to do things he just gets voted out. It's easier that way for everyone.

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..
Hey, I have asked this before, but does anyone understand the meaning of the phrase '20/20 hindsight'?

I seem to feel there is a lot of it around at the moment.

You can be a nurse and a Dr at the same time.

Tony Abbott? Who would listen to his impartial advice? All he can do is tear other people down but when he actually needs to do things he just gets voted out. It's easier that way for everyone.

Sure. In metric terms it means 6/6 vision after the fact.

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said...
www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/apr/11/tony-abbott-scott-morrison-covid-19-pandemic-response-overreaction-vaccination

Pfft, The Guardian.

Producing entertaining news that people want to read just to sell more papers (that they don't charge for, but that is besides the point).



mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

They often publish ---- information that utilizes loaded words (wording that ----- influence an audience by ---- emotion or stereotypes)

Overall, we rate The Guardian ----- Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks -------.

The Guardian holds a --- editorial bias and ------------ relies on sources that have failed fact checks. Further, ---- The Guardian has failed several fact checks, ----------- the reader must beware, and ------ we assign them a Mixed rating for factual reporting.

Note : the above extract may have been edited for size and space requirements to suit a seabreeze.com.au forum post.

Whilst we are on it, what the feck is the ABC on about ?

www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-11/aflpa-hits-out-at-afl-over-double-standards-in-finlayson-case/103694282

.......with Clarkson using the term "c*** s*****" towards the two players, while Finlayson called an individual opponent a "f*****".



........ I can only surmise two footballers were called a cute sweety and another a flower ?

What's the logic for including the terms but pretending to block them out, but not really, but kind-of ?

F***-me,

Select to expand quote

psychojoe said..
Sure. In metric terms it means...

Pretty sure in metric terms 20/20 means 1.

In imperial terms 20/20 means "about as long as the middle bit of your thumb plus a bit more if it is raining, but not if it is sunny".

www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-17/fact-check-fact-check-10-year-anniversary/102738260

Select to expand quote

Carantoc said..
Pfft, The Guardian.

Producing entertaining news that people want to read just to sell more papers (that they don't charge for, but that is besides the point).

mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Not sure their rating system is any good.

They rate news.com.au with high credibility? Compare home page of news.com.au with that on The Guardian. Tell me which one looks more like a pile of dog shiit.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-com-au/

Dr John Campbell, 54,522 views Dec 30, 2020, Vaccination, excellent news

?si=D0HgKzwICHZFEZo6

"I'm now joined by john campbell he's an independent health analyst an educator and joins us from carlisle in the north of england
dr campbell thanks for joining us this uh pandemic is hitting your country and so many others very hard at this time how important is this new vaccine?

It really is but this new vaccine is the best news we've had in the pandemic and it is going to change the situation entirely, now in the united kingdom we're going to start a mass roll out of this vaccine from the 4th of january we're going to be vaccinating a million people a week from that point and that's only going to build up as the logistics and infrastructure develops and as well as that what we're going to do is we're going to give one dose of this vaccine and then wait a full three months before we give the second dose, so that means an awful lot of people are going to start to get a fairly good level of immunity straight away without waiting for the second dose, and of course it also means we can vaccinate many more people so it really is going to change the situation in the united kingdom and in time in europe

But this this vaccine this new one oxford astrozenica vaccine is the second but we've already seen in trials that it's not as effective as the biontech Pfizer one is it good enough?

It certainly is good enough anything over 50 percent is going to be efficacious but we had the managing director of pfizer making a press announcement just a few days ago saying the efficacy of this would just be as good as the pfizer and the moderna vaccine now we don't have the scientific data on that yet, but it's looking very promising and the key seems to be in the gap between the two doses, so giving a longer gap between the first and the second dose seems to increase the efficacy, so although we have efficacy figures of like 62 70 up to 90 depending on the dosing regime, what he says is we've found the right formula and we should be up there with the others

So we are expecting high levels of efficacy so yes it is good enough and we believe this vaccine is safe as well

Well that certainly sounds promising

Select to expand quote

remery said..
Dr John Campbell, 54,522 views Dec 30, 2020, Vaccination, excellent news

?si=D0HgKzwICHZFEZo6

"I'm now joined by john campbell he's an independent health analyst an educator and joins us from carlisle in the north of england
dr campbell thanks for joining us this uh pandemic is hitting your country and so many others very hard at this time how important is this new vaccine?

It really is but this new vaccine is the best news we've had in the pandemic and it is going to change the situation entirely, now in the united kingdom we're going to start a mass roll out of this vaccine from the 4th of january we're going to be vaccinating a million people a week from that point and that's only going to build up as the logistics and infrastructure develops and as well as that what we're going to do is we're going to give one dose of this vaccine and then wait a full three months before we give the second dose, so that means an awful lot of people are going to start to get a fairly good level of immunity straight away without waiting for the second dose, and of course it also means we can vaccinate many more people so it really is going to change the situation in the united kingdom and in time in europe

But this this vaccine this new one oxford astrozenica vaccine is the second but we've already seen in trials that it's not as effective as the biontech Pfizer one is it good enough?

It certainly is good enough anything over 50 percent is going to be efficacious but we had the managing director of pfizer making a press announcement just a few days ago saying the efficacy of this would just be as good as the pfizer and the moderna vaccine now we don't have the scientific data on that yet, but it's looking very promising and the key seems to be in the gap between the two doses, so giving a longer gap between the first and the second dose seems to increase the efficacy, so although we have efficacy figures of like 62 70 up to 90 depending on the dosing regime, what he says is we've found the right formula and we should be up there with the others

So we are expecting high levels of efficacy so yes it is good enough and we believe this vaccine is safe as well

Well that certainly sounds promising

Why are there no ads at the start of his videos or during? Doesn't he monetise them?

Dr. Hodkinson: "It's Not a Time to Say 'I'm Sorry' - It's a Time to Put These Bastards in Jail" (substack.com)

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
Why are there no ads at the start of his videos or during? Doesn't he monetise them?

Do the right thing; admit that the John Campbell has zero credibility and then apologise to the broader Seabreeze community for wasting our time.

He's no physician, but he was a half decent educator; so "lost all credibility" is probably a fairer statement.

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
Do the right thing; admit that the John Campbell has zero credibility and then apologise to the broader Seabreeze community for wasting our time.

Haha

There's a parallel world out there.

The ones who swallow the spew and the others who have eyes to see and do their own research independent of the mainstream media that is owned by the usual suspects.

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..


Do the right thing; admit that the John Campbell has zero credibility and then apologise to the broader Seabreeze community for wasting our time.

In Scotland right now FD may be prosecuted for hurting your feelings under their new hate crime laws.

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..
There's a parallel world out there.

The ones who swallow the spew and the others who have eyes to see and do their own research independent of the mainstream media that is owned by the usual suspects.

So what are we to think about your "own research" when your supporting evidence is obviously wrong?

I'd believe your assertion of a parallel world, one where your opinion and beliefs are completely divorced from the physical world. Nothing to do with media