Select to expand quote
remery said..
Read the paper. That's why I provided the reference.
Yeah but, but... that doesn't make any sense.
..because previously the rule was that we should not listen to what somebody has to say if they can't be bothered to spell things correctly, and we certainly aren't to pay for the priviledge of hearing their message.
So I understood I should doubly definitely not pay to read the paper if the author(s) make a spelling mistake AND it is then repeated by a Seabreeze forum re-poster.
I am now understanding this scientific rule is only valid if you have already decided you don't want to read / listen / consider the matter, and is not valid if the issues at hand confirm your already concluded opinion.
**** -me. $59 to read the paper and I am not even allowed to disseminate the info to anyone else once I have read it.
I reckon I'd rather pay, oh lets say $140 for arguments sake, to meet and listen to the author and another couple of subject peers, be able to interact, ask questions and get live responses and also have a few sammies thrown in at the mid-break interval. Plus - at the end of it get a free youtube vid of what happened and be encouraged to freely disseminate it to anyone I want to.