Select to expand quote
japie said..
Did you now! So why did you post an article from The Conversation?
I fail to see where my "interpretation" was employed with regard to the video clip I posted, and the transcript for that matter.
Okay, I can help with that. Your original bit about your daughter in law and so on talks about excess deaths, and then you jump onto it being the vaccines. That appears to be your interpretation. There is no mention of the video, just that you have read about excess deaths... and then you seemingly put 2 and 2 together,
"Do you know what? I smell a rat. Not just your ordinary rattus norvegicus. but a mighty great big fibber rat. That's right. A porky pie rat!
And guess what? The only thing that the broader science community can tell us with absolute certainty is that it is one hundred percent not the jibby jab. We know that not because there has been research done but just because.
"
I think the above shows that you are interpreting the reason for the excess deaths.
Select to expand quote
japie said..
Life insurance data with regard to mortality is probably as robust as you can get. You're either contributing or being contributed for or you are dead in which case your family is collecting.
The insurance data which was quoted on came from One Life and was specific to Group Life which is a product that caters specifically for corporations who insure their employees. Think about this demographic. Working age. Probably above average intelligence and probably more likely to have a cleaner life style and take care of their health.
Think about the vaccination statistics for corporations. It's not difficult. Do you think that they would be more likely or less likely to be vaccinated? ( Having worked for Masterfoods for over ten years I can assure you that employees for that company would have been under serious pressure to take the jibby jab. They pressured me into taking a flu shot in 1985, my last.)
And you are trying to argue that the excess mortality was largely amongst the un-jibby jabbed?
Stop wallowing and employ some critical thinking!
Who is quesitoning the stats? Not me. The reason though is up for debate. The article I posted refers to a study that compares the death stats from the unvaccinated with the vaccinated. It suggests that you would expect to see a higher rate in the vaxxed versus the unvaxxed but you see the reverse.
The logic is that if the vaccines were the cause, you should see a higher rate of excess mortality in the vaccinated.
There is also mention that people with existing illnesses were prioritised for vaccination, so you would expect to see more deaths from that group because of this.