Select to expand quote
Kamikuza said..Macroscien said..Kamikuza said..Macroscien said..Yep
Here is something that should give our audience
clue
about credibility
certain people like you

I hope that most SBreezers here are
laughing too
reading you
www.forbes.com/sites/sofialottopersio/2021/11/04/no-one-died-from-radiation-at-****ushima-iaea-boss-statement-met-with-laughter-at-cop26/?sh=6569e15e7a47

that is example how data could be manipulated,
to present ****ushima in better light to the public
by their government.
Why even people call ****usima disaster since nobody died...?
Oh excellent thanks for the soft ball.
Those deaths are almost all from people evacuating, mostly elderly people. Nobody died when the reactor went up, and IIRC only a
couple of people a single person died many years later of exposure working on the site during clean-up.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/****ushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties
www.npr.org/2018/09/05/644933882/japanese-government-acknowledges-first-****ushima-radiation-death
So yeah, you're manipulating that data and anyone laughing is a plank of wood.
this is example of manipulation of statistics and data.
The point is that DUE TO ****USIMA NUCLEAR PLANT DISASTER
two thousand people died !
If there was properly build nuclear plant or no plant NOBODY WILL DIE !
ZERO !
If they died because slab of nuclear plant fall on their head , radiation or anything at all
doesn't matter how you categorize
there are all death related to ****USIMA NUCLEAR PLANT FAILURE.
Get yourself wind turbine or solar plant if you can not build safe nuclear plant, mate.
That only future demonstrate that your mates know as much about nuclear energy plants as you about vaccines,You are walking disaster , mate.
"No-one died from RADIATION at ****ushima"
That's not manipulation of anything, that's a factual.
"Because of the disaster at ****ushima, 2314 died as they were evacuated."
Sure, that's a factual statement too.
But claiming that dying of radiation poisoning is the same as dying in an evacuation is spurious.
Seems you're fond of conflating data sets and declaring correlation as causation. No wonder you get your knickers in such a knot.
Yep
I have got it.
All your nuclear plants in Japan are completely safe
because nobody ever die to radiation
when it blows up !!
All people will die trying to escape as soon as possible !
2300 people exactly !
Yep,
I got it, Now Americans could claim nobody died
in Hiroshima due to radiation
only trying to escape the blast !
( sorry to those offended by pulling this string)
The fact is that your ****usima nuclear plant was
defective, wrongly design in first place.
It shouldn't exist at all in such form.
Then nobody could die.
Playing with numbers ,putting to different categories
doesn't change a thing, People died due to your nuclear plant failure !
Yep.
Suppose that your government convince Australian
to buy your design and you build one of those plant for us.
Nobody will die in Sydney when your plant blow up
to radiation, only few thousand will die escaping .
Thank you , I would rather stick to our Solar Panel farms.