Select to expand quote
Flying Dutchman said..FormulaNova said..
So how is your comprehension? We have updated info, but if you read that link, is it Pfizer or the FDA?
Please tell me I read FDA and didn't accidentally miss Pfizer?
Yes that's right you missed Pfizer, they would be thrilled to have the papers released 55 years early.
So, in the end we have come up with '55 years' for the FDA to release information. When in actual fact the FDA stated that with the amount of information requested, no being specific enough, at their normal rate it would take years to deliver. Not Pfizer. And not to obfuscate anything.
When you read the link I posted, it seems that when they (the originators of the court case) actually did narrow the information down to a reasonable amount the FDA provided it in a decent time. It seems that the time taken to filter everything at the level required and for the amount of pages requested, it was a reasonable timeframe. Pure effort, not stalling, not avoiding. Just the amount of effort required when someone requests hundreds of thousands of pages and they need to be processed.
And it was the FDA, not Pfizer.
Your claim of Pfizer not wanting the information released for 75 years is clearly horse pucky. Yet you have stated it without question.
All explainable by reading the logic and actions behind, but it doesn't sound nearly as exciting as making out that Pfizer are clearly hiding something so important that they need to hide it for 75 years!
As the information was provided and we haven't heard anything important from it, it seems it was a non event anyway.
Wow, what a snore, but it sounded good.