Select to expand quote
Chris 249 said..FormulaNova said..Chris 249 said..
The funny thing about the anti-Yes posters here is that they don't seem to be able to actually do their own research.
Yes they do and here it is:


I feel obliged to point out that these views are crazy and they are not mine. It's just a social media post that people are referring to for their source of 'research'. I have to say I cringe when I read 'your sitting back...'.
It's pathetic and bizarre, isn't it. They are too gullible to actually read what the document referred to is all about, and that no one says that the Voice will make any of these recommendations.
We don't know what representations the Voice will make, we don't know how the representations will be made, we don't know how binding those representations will be on the parliament, we don't know how the people who make up the Voice will come to be there, we don't know if they can be removed, we don't know how many there will be. We do not know any detail on how it will operate
We do know the Uluru Statement from the heart has three objectives Voice, Treaty, Truth. We do know the voice is step one, its a matter of public record. We do know from the same public records some of the authors of the Uluru statement want reparations, we do know they want Aboriginal Soveriengty, we do know they want every one to pay the rent. We do know they want a transfer of power. Theses are matters of public record.
We do know that the constitution is the most important document in the country, what it says over rules anything parliament says or does and we know that The High court interprets it but we don't know how it will be interpreted by the High court.
We also know that if we get the constitution wrong it would be nigh impossible to undo.