Select to expand quote
kato said..
No. I think that the NO camp ran a better campaign and the YES didn't understand the level of distrust of Goverment.
In the end enough loonys believed the crap rather than the question that was being asked.
110 groups provide advice to Govement, this would have removed 4 groups and made one voice that would remain despite changes of Goverment. Thats it!.....Nothing more.
The Racist, Uninformed, Uneducated, Conspiracists and couldn't be bothered all voted for the current treatment to continue.
Loonies?
Racist?
The question wasn't "Do you like Aborigines? Yes?No."
The question seemed to be "Should we put yet another useless level of bureaurocracy to the bunch of useless ones that are already failing the Aboriginal people?"
The Yes arguments were pathetic. "oh, we can't listen to Aboriginals unless you vote Yes" ....Yes you can, you just listen.
Aborigines are already well represented and well funded. Their problems are many and varied and no one has an effective solution, because there isn't one.
As I see it, they are trapped in a vacuum between cultures. They have been too affected by modern life to ever return to their old culture, yet have not been able to fast forward the 20,000 years of development required to fit into the modern world.
I believe welfarism has ,and continues to destroy their self reliance and self respect.
And yes, I have spent time in Aboriginal communities and talked to people who are trying to help them. These people are tearing their hair out as nothing seems to work.
Any young Aborigine who shows a spark of nous or motivation and wants , for instance , to start an apprenticeship on a mine site is denigrated by his peers as a "sellout to the white fella" and is basically worn down by his own people until he finally gives up and returns to doing nothing.