This topic is really interesting to me. I am no expert but this is my take from my own research and I think it depends a lot on the foil you choose. When I tried the Slingshot foil on the 133 litre board, the board felt unnecessarily big for me at ~97kg. It was heavy to carry around and I knew I would not go in that direction of a board that big and heavy. Perhaps a large light board would be better. Though the foiling was super fun and got me hooked!
The wider and thinner chord foils (high aspect ratio like NP carbon race etc) are designed to be more stable at a higher speed than lower speed and take more speed to get going, opposite to the Naish (though it still achieves a respectable top end). Therefore you do not need as big a sail to get going on the Naish. As you do not need a bigger sail you can probably get away with a much smaller board size including width. Most people can easily up haul a 122 litre board, 110 is fine for most and certainly at my light weight

. Though the short and wide seems to work best from all the forums I have read as there is less swing weight and the width is stability.
I think the much larger board (155 litre) would likely have some detriment in that it is heavier and may be more of an issue once going fast or if the wind picks up (wind resistance, friction, turbulence etc). So on many of the foils they work well on boards around 120 litre and 80 wide, but on some foils you probably want a bit more width and volume to be stable and on others can probably get away with less. This is mostly surmising from what I have read
I wonder how small a board the Naish would work with? But at 73 wide most people I have spoken to say it is more than stable enough. NP suggest boards of 70cm wide and up for their fast foils and I know of people who have easily used the NP on smaller boards than 120 litre.
So with the Naish or similar foils (stable and early take off ) then perhaps even smaller again than the hover will work well?