Select to expand quote
Pcdefender said..
Used my 7m Mach 2 a few days ago in 10 knots up to 20 knots and the physicality of it compared to my next sail size down a 5.6m was really stark.
Packed up after an hour as i was not enjoying sailing despite the wind still being good.
The weight of the 7m M2 is 5.4 kgs the same as my 5.6 Patrik but it feels heavier perhaps as its catching a lot more wind - lol.
Hated it in the 20 knot gusts despite having lots of downhaul.
It was fast enough but its going up for sale now.
Also disliked my Patrik 7m for the very same reason.
On my Patrik 110 with a 37 carbon fin i struggle big time to lift the windward rail with a 7m as i feel the sideways force created by the bigger sail considerably reduces the lift of the board.
With my 5.6 on the same board and fin the lift of the board is much greater which also means sailing upwind is a breeze which adds considerably to the enjoyment of the sport.
The more the windward rail lifts - the easier i find to sail upwind.
Realized i would rather be on / off the plane with my 5.6 than on the plane all the time with my 7m as the feel is so much nicer with my smaller sail.
Going to try my NP Evo 4 6.4m as a light wind option.
Just not convinced anything bigger than 5.6m really works for 70 kg sailors unless the wind is very marginal. 6.4m at a push.
Using a bigger board to get going earlier detracts from the feel less than using a bigger sail.
I see some wing ding or use a foil on the light days which is another option.
I just noticed this thread. At 68Kg (ok 70) I always had trouble with anything bigger than 7.0, although 6.5/6.6 for me has been the go to sail in the San Francisco Bay Area medium wind days. People in the 90-110Kg range have no idea of the problem!
I used to have HSM GPS 6.6 and the difference from a 5.2-5.4, was significant, with the GPS 7.3 in light air another significant size up. But the problem was that the 7.3 was very hard to manage the second the wind picked up. I tried a Switchblade 7.3, a Goya Mark 2 7.2. Same story. So I switched to Point-7 ACX, and suddenly I was not overpowered by the heavy unyielding sail any longer. 6.5 and 7.5 ACXs are completely fine in overpowered conditions.
The other side of the story. The board. You need to get one that works at our weight. I owned an Isonic 111, a Patrik 100, a Carbon Art 100, Futura 71, no matter ... too big: I cannot take them where they need to be. Your Patrik 110 is big for us. I have now a Patrik 122 and it works great as a light air board but ... I use it severely under-powered! It is a board that would come alive with a 8.5, 100 Kg pilot, I go out with it in 12 knots and a 6.8, quick to retreat if the wind comes up!!!! Only slalom board that ever worked in overpowered conditions for me was a Carbon Art 52 wide ...
But now ... enter the AV Modena 60 wide by 88 liters (!), together with the Point-7 ACX and recently ACZ 6.8. Without repeating myself you can read about it here
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/Review/AV-Boards#2779414. In a nutshell this is what really works. I do not get overpowered by the board or sails, I am in control all the time, the board is on rails, flying on the fin with no trouble.
Just saying: at our weight you need to find what works keeping in mind that boards and sails do get better! For me the trick is to go as small as I can with the board, the new shapes short and wide, volume in the back, scooped deck and pinched tail help a lot, and as big as possible with the sail. The Modena 88 liters with 5.8 and 6.8 covers quite a stunning range. But I am sure there are other combos that work.
Small is good, although we would never win a PWA race.
PS Wings? forget wings ... they just seem to like to be standing still.