"Now they'll say all these stories are terrible. Well, these stories have, you know, you've heard my story in the boat with the shark, right?

I got killed on that. They thought I was rambling. I'm not rambling. We couldn't get the boat to float. The battery is so heavy. So then I start to talk about asking questions.

You know, I have an, I had an uncle who was a great professor at MIT for many years, long, I think the longest tenure ever. Very smart, had three different degrees, and you know so I have an aptitude for these things.

You know, there is such a thing as an aptitude.

I said, well, what would happen if this boat is so heavy and started to sink and you're on top of the boat? Do you get electrocuted or not? In other words, the boat is going down and you're on top - will the electric currents flow through the water and wipe you out?

And let's say there's a shark about 10 yards over there. Would I have to immediately abandon or could I ride the electric down. And he said, "sir, nobody's ever asked us that question. But sir, I don't know."

I said, "well, I want to know because I guarantee you one thing, I don't care what happens - I'm staying with the electric. I'm not getting over with it."

So I tell that story. And the fake news, they go, "he told this crazy story with electric." It's actually not crazy, it's sort of a smart story, right? Sort of like, you know, it's like the snake, it's a smart when you, you figure what you're leaving in, right?

You bring it in the, you know, the snake, right?

The snake and the snake. I tell that, and they do the same thing."

From my observations you are making several points in the one post. I'll attempt to address each point one by one.

Defense Against Criticism: You anticipate criticism of your story, specifically referencing a past experience involving a shark and a boat, which was dismissed as rambling.

Justification of Story: You assert that this story isn't rambling but rather a thoughtful consideration of a practical problem: whether an electrically-powered boat would pose an electrocution risk if it began to sink.

Intellectual Background: You make reference to an uncle who was a long-tenured professor at MIT, implying that they possess a certain level of intellectual aptitude by association.

Unique Inquiry: You highlight their unique thought process by pointing out that their question about electric currents and safety in a sinking boat scenario was unprecedented and not easily answered.

Resilience and Decision-Making: You conclude by affirming their commitment to staying with the electric equipment in such a scenario, suggesting a certain level of resolve and practicality.

Criticism of Media: You criticize the media (referred to as "fake news") for misrepresenting or mocking the stories, defending the intellectual merit and practical value of the questions and scenarios. Overall, you are defending the narrative against accusations of rambling, showcasing the problem-solving approach, intellectual background, and criticizing the media for misrepresentation.

How did I go?

Wow I feel I have stumbled into a discussion between competing AIs.

Instead I find a rambling string of sentences seemingly from Donald Trump, and then an analysis of it. Can we get back to solving middle-east conflicts, debunking the moon landing, and deciding what political policy to believe in in fantasty land?

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
From my observations you are making several points in the one post. I'll attempt to address each point one by one.

Defense Against Criticism: You anticipate criticism of your story, specifically referencing a past experience involving a shark and a boat, which was dismissed as rambling.

Justification of Story: You assert that this story isn't rambling but rather a thoughtful consideration of a practical problem: whether an electrically-powered boat would pose an electrocution risk if it began to sink.

Intellectual Background: You make reference to an uncle who was a long-tenured professor at MIT, implying that they possess a certain level of intellectual aptitude by association.

Unique Inquiry: You highlight their unique thought process by pointing out that their question about electric currents and safety in a sinking boat scenario was unprecedented and not easily answered.

Resilience and Decision-Making: You conclude by affirming their commitment to staying with the electric equipment in such a scenario, suggesting a certain level of resolve and practicality.

Criticism of Media: You criticize the media (referred to as "fake news") for misrepresenting or mocking the stories, defending the intellectual merit and practical value of the questions and scenarios. Overall, you are defending the narrative against accusations of rambling, showcasing the problem-solving approach, intellectual background, and criticizing the media for misrepresentation.

How did I go?

Gee, I think you got it. You could get a paying job as Donald's interpreter, but you wouldn't like it. He'd just blame you for everything.

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..
Wow I feel I have stumbled into a discussion between competing AIs.

Instead I find a rambling string of sentences seemingly from Donald Trump, and then an analysis of it. Can we get back to solving middle-east conflicts, debunking the moon landing, and deciding what political policy to believe in in fantasty land?

Shhhhhh I'm watching this my favourite bit is about to happen

We're making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person . er, eligible for what I've been able to do with the . uh . with the Covid. Excuse me, with, dealing with everything we had to do with . uh . look......
........
.....we finally beat Medicare


I've changed the way that now you're in a situation where 40 per cent fewer coming across the border legally, especially when he left office, to continue the moment till we get to total ban, .........the total initiative, .............relative to what we're going to do with more Border Patrol

Select to expand quote

Carantoc said..
We're making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person . er, eligible for what I've been able to do with the . uh . with the Covid. Excuse me, with, dealing with everything we had to do with . uh . look......
........
.....we finally beat Medicare


I've changed the way that now you're in a situation where 40 per cent fewer coming across the border legally, especially when he left office, to continue the moment till we get to total ban, .........the total initiative, .............relative to what we're going to do with more Border Patrol

All of a sudden RFK Jnr doesn't look so bad to the Democrats haha

I got a bit confused earlier. I though I was watching the US pesidential debate. Turned out to be something far more sane :

Select to expand quote

Carantoc said..
I got a bit confused earlier. I though I was watching the US pesidential debate. Turned out to be something far more sane :

Biden waffled. Trump lied. That was pretty much the whole debate debacle. Democrats should have been profiling Harris a year or more ago. We will end up with a lying, narcissitic, corrupt felon as president. NATO will collapse. Happy days.

Why wasn't Robert Kennedy jr able to debate these Muppets?

Select to expand quote

snoidberg said..
Why wasn't Robert Kennedy jr able to debate these Muppets?

Democracy

Select to expand quote

snoidberg said..
Why wasn't Robert Kennedy jr able to debate these Muppets?

Trumps a lunatic, Biden's too old. RFK Jnr would have won the debate if they let him on.

He'll be able to at the next one.

The three of them almost make our politicians seem capable and competent (almost)

Rumour going around that Scomo appointed himself president last week.

You heard it here first folks.

The fact that he is not endorsed by the democratic party absolutely exposes the whole political scene. From all of the candidates I have listened to Kennedy is one of only two who have exposed the role of the intelligence agencies and government bodies in subverting the population. Both he and Ramaswamy described how they would dismantle them using the rule of law. Ramaswamy was erudite about the fact that the creation of CIA in particular was unconstitutional.

The election interference has reached a level that in my view puts the whole system at risk of complete breakdown. I watched Tucker Carlson responding to a question from an Aussie journalist about Assange yesterday. It was a loaded question which he handled without fumbling once. He described the situation where Assange was held in custody for telling the truth whilst Mike Pence, who, whilst he was in the drivers seat at the CIA, plotted to murder Assange.

The whole question time was very worthwhile listening to. Amongst a dozen odd other journalists I have been listening to Carlson for over a year now. His firing from Fox has liberated him from the control of a corporation. The result is encouraging. When I first came across him way back in 2004 I thought he was an absolute wally. He has climbed a very high mountain.

x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1806034521369776406

Mountain of crap, perhaps.

I like how he, Tucker Carlson, has declared that no one believes in evolution anymore, that it has been proven to be false.

Wasn't Tucker Carlsons defence against lying on Fox news that "you can't believe anything he says"
At least he was correct with that.

He seems like most of the talking heads on the media who speak out controlled opposition.

His stance on 911 should tell you everything you need to know.

He seemingly if you believe him has had lots of vaccines - another smoking gun.

"I've had like a million of them," he said of vaccines.

Select to expand quote

D3 said..
Mountain of crap, perhaps.

I like how he, Tucker Carlson, has declared that no one believes in evolution anymore, that it has been proven to be false.

Proof that he is either an idiot or an attention-seeker. I suspect the latter, there's money to be made from the attention of gullible morons.

Select to expand quote

D3 said..

I like how he, Tucker Carlson, has declared that no one believes in evolution anymore, that it has been proven to be false.

RFK was $64 yesterday, be interesting to see where this goes.

www.sportsbet.com.au/betting/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2024-5479667

Select to expand quote

remery said.
.....Democrats should have been profiling Harris a year or more ago. We will end up with a lying, narcissitic, corrupt felon as president. NATO will collapse.

That's a pretty negative opinion of Kamala Harris you have there. Mind you if she brings to NATO what she brings to everything else you may be right.

Select to expand quote

remery said..
Biden waffled. Trump lied. That was pretty much the whole debate debacle. Democrats should have been profiling Harris a year or more ago. We will end up with a lying, narcissitic, corrupt felon as president. NATO will collapse. Happy days.

Biden waffled is being kind. Biden reckons he's got a 6 or 8 golf handicap. He can hardly stand up. Haha you can't make this shiit up.

Amazing that the ruling party in the most powerful country in the world thought it would be a good idea to keep pushing Biden into another 4 years. He'll be a vegetable in a few years. He couldn't get a job at Maccas.

People within the Democratic party are scared to lose their jobs. And these are the same Einsteins that have been telling everyone the covid vaccine is safe and effective. What a clown show.

^Republican liar, draft dodger and convicted felon Trump has taken all credit for the Warp Speed vaccine.

Select to expand quote

remery said..
^Republican liar, draft dodger and convicted felon Trump has taken all credit for the Warp Speed vaccine.

Trump's a lunatic

At this stage the trump campaign is willing to pay Biden to stay in the race. They know they can beat him. They also know that anyone, absolutely anyone under the age of 70 would wipe the floor with trump. Heck, the democrats could even run AOC and beat trump.

Select to expand quote

philn said..
At this stage the trump campaign is willing to pay Biden to stay in the race. They know they can beat him. They also know that anyone, absolutely anyone under the age of 70 would wipe the floor with trump. Heck, the democrats could even run AOC and beat trump.

I know almost nothing of American politics, just the stuff I hear on the radio or random places.

Given what you have said above, why are they keeping Biden as their presidential nominee if he is coming across as incompetent? I can see why the other team keeps Trump as he seems to appeal to a certain demographic and there seem to be a lot of them in your population.

Are there no presidential candidates in your country under 70 that want to be president?

Do you have to pay lots of money to be the president over there? (Not just to strippers)

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said...
..., why are they keeping Biden as their presidential nominee if he is coming across as incompetent? ...

...because if they admit he is not fit to be a candidate in November then why is he fit the be president today ?

It would create some tricky questions to answer. And Joe can't even answer whether he needs a piss or a shi t.