Select to expand quote
boardbumps said..colas said.. ghost4man said..
Colas,
I think the emphasis here is looking at the functional elements of the board. If you have a look at the nose with the concave aspects its clear that this design has been incorporated for a
specific reason and that is to promote lift. In other words why have a pointy nose as is the domain of traditional shaping for performance boards if it is not beneficial. As I said in a previous
post, you only have to look at sports like water skiing, snow boarding etc and yes I make the concession that we are talking about different mediums here, but why do they not incorporate
this type of shape, that is a pointy nose, into their gear particularly when speed an maneuevrability are such critical factors. Why be hamstrung by traditional dogma? Cant wait to get on
one of these boards and have a go.
Ozzie
Again, I am not saying "it wont work". I am just questioning the explanations, not the facts. Hey at 220 lbs I have been riding 6'6" SUPs for more than 3 years now, so I had my dose of "It wont work" (or: "It will only dishpan") targeted to me :-)
PS: Pointed noses work much better in snowboarding... in the powder, and with added length.
And thats what the tomo nose is all about 5'2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, nothing over 6'0. With longer lengths a pointed nose, or is it a full nose, or a round nose makes sense.
Its all about getting the maximum surface area in the shortest length with the narrowest plan shape.
It wasn't so long ago that pointed full noses were the worst design element because thay got in the road and kept on catching!!
Boardbumps I would question this. Why does a pointed nose make sense on the longer lengths? Whats the reasoning there. I just think that there are times when we
are caught up by traditional dogma to the exclusion of everything on the basis of what seems to be a correct presupposition. I think one of the elements that I am realising more
and more with these tomo inspired designs is the functionality element. If its not required or doesnt give any added benefit then why have it there. Intuitively the parallel rails thinking
seems to work because we can cut down the size of a board by a significant margin, retain volume and surface area as well make the board narrower. Its during the setup phase of catching
a wave where things become interesting. When you see a wave approaching and you start to paddle to get on at some point you will feel the board getting lifted. This happens due to the physical
principles of peaks and troughs of wave dynamics. When we wait for a wave we are effectively speaking waiting in a trough. As the wave comes along our intention is to get on the peak. Now once
you get on the peak this is where feeling will guide you as to the performance of the board. Boards react very differently during this phase. Some boards require intense paddling to reach the point of
forward momentum without any additional intervention on the part of the paddler. However some will start to plane a lot easier. The capacity to plane in this way comes down to a variety of factors not
least of which revolve around the shape of the board. A good way to test a boards planing ability is to sit in the pocket and without paddling see if the board will start to get on. Its this very element
that intrigues me about this design and it goes back to making the board as functional as possilbe.
Cheers Ozzie