Select to expand quote
boty said..
i think when restoring good boats that have proven track records it takes a huge leap of faith to change something that has been designed by a great guy built by a smart builder sailed by champions usually with a owner who had access to a serious budget
sure gains can be made probably with defiance the only things other than what Lida is doing would be carbon rig and fancy wardrobe but is that cost justifiable for the amount of gain i doubt it we did talk about these things early on and i think he has made the right decision if she had been a planing hull it may have been worthwhile but the weight saving and added stiffness of the carbon rig with such a stiff little boat isn't going to get her out of the water you will just get to 6 knots a fly**** earlier
but if you restore it for the "next 30" years that is almost like buying a new boat. And what wold cost you these days to buy a similar boat?
and I agree if you want to preserve the heritage of a boat leave it as it.
I was reading about this company somewhere in the USA, they lift the boats out of the water, scan the whole hull with lasers to create a 3D computer image and then they run it to fluid dynamic symulations to determine the weak spots of the design. Many times with minor adjustments to the hull they can achieve massive improvements. Often just small changes to the rudder shape/size can make great impact on handling. My dad always used to tell me that: "son, remember, you may be great at what you do, but there is always going to be someone, who is even better" - so, who is to say that there are no ways to improve on an already great design?