Select to expand quote
jn1 said..
I agree Mark. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the two offenders were armed with assault rifles (from what I could hear from the video). Back before the Port Arthur massacre, only two states legalised those types of weapons: NSW, and Tas. As far as I know, that 1996 massacre put laws in place to ban automatic weapons outright. So, what are media and pollies talking about now ?. Seems to me, slamming law abiding firearm owners with more red tape, and not addressing how the **** these illegal weapons are getting into the country is only going to improve the working conditions of criminals.
I didn't hear assault weapons, as in semiautomatic, firing and reloading in response to a trigger action.
What I got from the news is that they were using slide action rifles and shotguns. Some of the video looks like a pump action weapon.
I thought they were banned way back in 1996, but gun manufacturing has changed since then. There are lever action weapons that do the same job and are legal and carry 10 rounds.
If we want to keep weapons out of the hands of deranged people, maybe claiming to believe in God should be enough to disqualify a licence applicant. After all, it's an unprovable proposition, so rational people would say they don't know, and arguments over which particular unprovable proposition is best have killed a hell of a lot of people over history, starting off with the Jews carrying out a genocide on the Canaanites in the second book of the collected works of Jehovah.
And finally, in response to some Rabbi's declaration that the best way to combat antisemitism is to be more Jewish, I'm conflicted. Yes, I could get another circumcision, but I'm afraid it will hurt