Select to expand quote
FoilAddict said..All st
leepasty said..FoilAddict said..
Here's what I found works:
1125/85m/70f/232v2 0 to -1 over A+
925/85m/60/232v2 -1 over A+
1550v2/85m/60f/232v2 -1 to -1,5 over A+
I have also tried the 925/85/60/v200 twice and it probably needs about -1.5 over A+
you mean adding -1 shim or running it with no shim on a+ so it's minus 1?
ive been finding the v200 better winging with no shim on the 925 but not tried any more negative
These are on top of the -1 in the A+ system.
Just to be 100% clear, by adding negative shims on top of the -1 (which is built in to the v2 tails), you mean increasing the downward force of the tail wing, correct?
Do also you happen to know by any chance if this built-in -1 angle of the 232v2 is the same as the built-in angle of the 232v1? So, did they change the angle of the 232 from v1 to v2? I'm still running the "old" system with the titanium shims and a first version 232, so trying to figure out what the equivalent would be.
Another question I'd be keen to hear your thoughts on Kane, is what a higher aspect ratio tail achieves in your opinion? I don't have the riding skills to test or validate in the water, but as a thought experiment I would think: a higher aspect ratio increases the slope of the Cl-alpha curve, so at a bigger pitch deflection you would get a comparatively speaking higher stabilizing force, and this would result in a more pitch stable setup? I would imagine this is favorable, especially as you start going faster. Trying to think of the negatives, quicker to stall?