Select to expand quote
Sandman1221 said..Francone said..antonmik said..FRPGear said..Ability to invent and talent to sale could be conflicting skill sets that do not coexist in one package.
This old video is more relevant:
Antonmik
A few words regarding your conclusion that the seller has made false claims about the minifoil , because , while raising the tail , it would make the nose of the board plunge in the water, thereby stopping the board in its tracks...
I'm looking into this minifoil myself. It is certainly true that salesmanship and honesty do not always go hand in hand, but there are perhaps other things to consider before concluding that we have been lied to....
First, the fact that the minifoil raises the tail of the board is already a good sign that it does provide lift.
If the nose plunges, is it really a flaw in the design or rather a question of technique? Perhaps the nose dive can be be corrected by shifting the body towards the tail to counterbalance it. Did you try this? This is necessary even on regular foils, where you can adjust the lift and have the board sit higher or lower on the water ( hence correct the nose dip) by shifting the weight..
I'd also consider other variables in the equation: the type of board, the sailor's skill, the weight and the wind conditions. Shifting the rig backward or forward along the mastfoot rail can also correct the nose dive...
Secondly, and more importantly, FRP has a 30 days full refund return warranty. This speaks to the seller' s good will. Why should one complain that the minifoil is not working and that he has been lied to when he could have returned it for a full refund?
Francone
Fracone, do you know of anyone who returned a minifoil to FRP within the first 30 days and got a full refund?
Select to expand quote
Sandman1221 said..Francone said..antonmik said..FRPGear said..Ability to invent and talent to sale could be conflicting skill sets that do not coexist in one package.
This old video is more relevant:
Antonmik
A few words regarding your conclusion that the seller has made false claims about the minifoil , because , while raising the tail , it would make the nose of the board plunge in the water, thereby stopping the board in its tracks...
I'm looking into this minifoil myself. It is certainly true that salesmanship and honesty do not always go hand in hand, but there are perhaps other things to consider before concluding that we have been lied to....
First, the fact that the minifoil raises the tail of the board is already a good sign that it does provide lift.
If the nose plunges, is it really a flaw in the design or rather a question of technique? Perhaps the nose dive can be be corrected by shifting the body towards the tail to counterbalance it. Did you try this? This is necessary even on regular foils, where you can adjust the lift and have the board sit higher or lower on the water ( hence correct the nose dip) by shifting the weight..
I'd also consider other variables in the equation: the type of board, the sailor's skill, the weight and the wind conditions. Shifting the rig backward or forward along the mastfoot rail can also correct the nose dive...
Secondly, and more importantly, FRP has a 30 days full refund return warranty. This speaks to the seller' s good will. Why should one complain that the minifoil is not working and that he has been lied to when he could have returned it for a full refund?
Francone
Fracone, do you know of anyone who returned a minifoil to FRP within the first 30 days and got a full refund?
Sandman1221
There are two issues here:
a. .The minifoil allegedly does not work.
b. The seller is making false claims about it.
I'll note that the even if a) were true, this would not automatically entail the truth of b)
Let's get to the point.
When you ask me if I know of somebody who has returned the minifoil and received his money back, you seem to be concerned with point b) because you read perhaps somebody's complaint in this forum that the minifoil doesn't work and that he has therefore(?) been lied to.
To answer your question, no, honestly, I don't know of anybody who has returned this minifoil for a full refund and whether he received it or not, but I don't see the point of asking this question. What are you driving at?
Not being able to prove that somebody is not dishonest( note my negative phrasing) does not prove that he IS so.
This is the problem with negative proofs.
Whether or not something is the case ( honesty or quality of the product) can be reliably assessed only by producing evidence of his behavior.
No hearsay chatter can be such evidence. Until then, no conclusions can ( and should) be drawn, both logically and legally.
In a forum like this, unlike in a court of law, I am willing to keep the bar of evidence low and to believe anybody telling us that he or she has tested the minifoil and he or she has returned it for refund, but he never received it.
Some in this Forum accuse me of doggedly defending this product, in spite of everybody telling me that it is not reliable.
Incidentally, if you read the iWindsurf posts on this issue, you will see that this "everybody" is an overstatement, because there have been quite a few positive comments, too.
Please understand, I am not defending this product. I don't know enough about it. May be the product IS flawed and there have been false claims made about it , but intellectual honesty tells me that I owe it to myself to come to this conclusion only after being satisfied that people speak out of personal experience and not out of hearsay, as seems to be the case so far..
This is all I am saying.
Until then, let's put the issue to rest. As somebody said, there have been too many..electrons spilled on this..
Francone