Ted the Kiwi said..
http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/abc-news-special-james-hird-interview/NS1604H001S00

Interesting watch. I thought the interview was very poor. The interviewer was poor - she failed to follow up on any of her perceived tough questions. Leigh Sales would have been a much better choice. I thought she left a lot on the table. Never really took it to James.
Some of the questions thay world:

1. How come there was no record of the injections?
2. Why did none of the players admit to injections?
3. If no one knows what was injected how can you say that no one took any banned substances?
4. Why do you still fail to take any real responsibility?
5. Dank and Robinson - why did she not hammer more questions about those two - especially given the comments Hird made. Poor journalism.

It seemed to me that Hird did not want to say too much to incriminate himself but made it pretty clear that everyone else was to blame but himself - still not taking any responsibility ! Incredible. I would think that after that interview the guilty 34 should be looking forward to a pretty substantial settlement.