Your a bit all over the shop as well
One one hand you mention having to slow your boat down to 7 knots to give the crew a rest and on the other your into the you tubers for saying the same thing, sailing fast in open ocean can be wearing on a crew. So did the you tubers get that bit wrong or not.
Also you call BS on the risks of capsizing a performance cat, because you have never flown a hull, you then confirm cruising cats have capsized. That seems to be a contradiction, is a performance cat with a lighter displacement and more powerful rig less prone to capsize than a heavy cruiser with a smaller rig, that appears to be your argument. They literally said a cruiser is a bit more forgiving to sail than a performance boat in terms of active inputs from the crew. Who would have that would be the case.
I don't know how to diagnose PTSD but it seems pretty clear some people get scared sailing and it stands to reason that a faster more performance orientated boat is more likely to scare a person like that than a heavy cruiser. Just because John Sanders can sail around the world in a 34 footer doesn't mean everyone can. Quaff away in your drink all you like but facts are some people are frightened of sailing.
The entire premise of the video was that boats are a compromise, you sacrifice one thing to emphasise another. In this case it was performance versus comfort. You call BS on the premise but then contradict yourself. So maybe you can explain one more time for the dummies how that is incorrect.
I'm no fan of heavy cats, I wouldn't own any cat, not true I have a soft spot for Wharrams, but each to their own right. The video was just pointing out the trade offs between different boats. Seemed reasonable to me.