Select to expand quote
Ramona said..
It's nice but I would prefer to save 20 grand and buy an SS39.
For me dollars are the last consideration.
My first consideration is "Is it what I want?", be it yacht, car, house or whatever.
So forget about the money and let's line up the Lotus 10.6 (34.77 feet) and the S&S 39. Both designed about the same time.
S&S 39.
1. Designed to the IOR racing rule which is now defunct and irrelevant.
2. The beam with pinched ends are designed to increase WLL when heeled, nice, but when motoring that form digs a hole in the water and when powered up under sail will not plane.
3. Pinched ends reduces internal volume i.e cabin space as well as buoyancy and that hull form will tend to hobby horse in a seaway.
4. Originally designed as a racer to use one as a cruiser will tend to be expensive as far as rigging and deck hardware is concerned.
Lotus 10.6
1. Designed by the Kiwi legend Alan Wright who flat refused to design a yacht to a racing rule and I think drew his first hull when he was 10 year old .
2. Slightly more beam and LWL than the S&S and radically different hull form way ahead of it's time which is seen on most performance cruisers and racers today. Reasonably fine entry out to a good beam carried mostly to the transom with flat underwater lines which allows planing when powered up, transom hung rudder for light steering and simplicity plus easily powered with a lower horsepower engine.
The Lotus has 230 mm (9") less draught and is 3.5 tonne lighter.
3. Huge interior volume providing generous accommodation space, higher topsides providing plenty of reserve buoyancy (therefore stores carrying capacity) and through the cleverness of design the ergonomics of moving around on a Lotus is second to none.
4. Not being designed as a racer but as a performance cruising yacht the upkeep of rig and deck gear is economical in comparison.
What is there not to like about a Lotus yacht except me bragging about owning one??
sailboatdata.com/sailboat/ss-39sailboatdata.com/sailboat/lotus-106