Select to expand quote
TonyAbbott said..
Many school teachers are very political, they are happy when their students preach and regurgitate scripture from the church of climate change.
But they will not teach them the difference between anthropological global warming and natural climate change.
They will not teach them that sea level change is relative to land height, that rising seas can also be cause by land subsiding. Or that in some parts of Australia, relative sea level is falling, due to land uplift. Teachers don't ask students if the current sea level is normal, or if there is even a 'normal' sea level. For many teachers, critical thought means agreeing with the Greens.
Most students think co2 is called carbon, teachers are not teaching students that there are differences between carbon, co and co2, so long as they keep regurgitating the churches mantra.
When some students were writing an essay about a storm that caused significant coastal erosion, I asked them what they think might happen if the seas rose a couple of metres. Their response was that we will all die!!!!! not increased erosion, or higher sea walls, or some infrastructure will be lost, or one of many outcomes.....just we all are going to die. Most teachers don't correct this type of ridiculous thinking, they just think 'great', the student 'understands'.
Many teachers are failing students in becoming informed active citizens and turning into mindless political drones.
Ha ha evidence



When? where? how old where the students? Teachers quote? etc etc
Have a look at the curriculum and you will see things like:
Scientific understanding, including models and theories, is contestable and is refined over time through a process of review by the scientific community (ACSHE157) & (ACSHE191)
That was your opinion of something that might have happened or you made up to support you opinion.