Select to expand quote
Carantoc said..
Why would you need a GPS to count how many gybes you do without falling in ?
Couldn't you just count them ?
Use 1 for the first one, 2 for the second, 3 for the third, 4 for the fourth, etc.
If need help with what comes after 4, then I am sure somebody here could publish a table right up say 999.
You may find it hard to memorise the right order to count in, but with a bit of practice I am sure you could master it.
Mathematical formula for proposed category
'gybes at speed'
both counts
Amount of successful continues gybes x averaged speed at gybe alone ( doesn't matter what you do between gybes 1 meter or 1 km distance or what speed between )
There is a lot of tactics ( and skills) involved to get the best results in this competition.
Example.
If you took big beginner board and starts spinning around - definitely you could crack hunderds without falling into water.
But your results will be very poor because when you do multiply each gybe by relevant speed factor.
Sum of all this will be low, you score poorly.
If you are great alpha sailor but distance between gybes too big total amount of gybes will again reflect poorly on your result.
To get good results you need to perform maximum number of gybes at best / optimal speed.
One wrong move, not even your fault - something like another sailor or kiter on the way and you may starts counting from scratch again .
Stressful ?
We can add additional requirements for gybe to count - say achieve planning speed between gybes - say 15 ktn min.