OK here's a question for the gurus. Elmo's sent me his J1 files, they contain both .sbp and .gpx formats.
Here's the strange thing, the sbp file has a resolution of 0.019kts BUT the .gpx file's resolution appears to be 10x better at about 0.002kts.
Why is it so?
Does it mean the .gpx format is more accurate than the .sbp format? (somehow I doubt this)
Top pane is .sbp, bottom gpx.
So both panes are sorted in the "doppler" (speed) column so the speed progression is evident. The first thing you notice is that the track numbers aren't in quite the same order. Then looking at the two doppler columns the smallest speed increments are quite different, around 0.019 for the top pane and around 0.002 for the bottom.
If you also look at the "speed" (trackpoints) column you see some even bigger discrepancies, in one instance it has a 26 where the doppler is only saying 13. This is why doppler data is much preferred to trackpoints.