Saw this new 4 batten wave sail from Naish. Odd they only size them in S, M, L, XL rather than the traditional area m2 size.http://www.naishsails.com/2012/sails/chopper.html
Naish Chopper
Target: Hardcore wave sailors that weigh less than 185 lbs
185 lbs = 83.91 kg
Finally got wave boards for the 'larger' sailor... any guess as to if/when the big sail brands are going to follow suit and look after the 'big boned' types
Sizing below:
Small (S): This is the optimum size for conditions that would require a 4.2 out of a normal
sail range, with the benefit of an extended top end range similar to a 3.7
Medium (M): This is the optimum size for conditions that would require a 4.7 out of a normal
sail range, with the benefit of an extended top end range similar to a 4.2
Large (L): This is the optimum size for conditions that would require a 5.3 out of a normal
sail range, with the benefit of an extended top end range similar to a 4.7
X-Large (XL): This is the optimum size for conditions that would require a 5.7 out of a normal
sail range, with the benefit of an extended top end range similar to a 5.3
I don't think it's too bad a sizing concept as long as you know what sailor's weight it's based on and in this case 185lbs (84kg). An "average" weight standard used by other makers too? The wind range is a good mention. Noble attempt at changing standards of just numbers?
yeah, i wasn't suggesting anything but putting forward some answers for windwarriors thoughts on sails for larger sailors.![]()
Justin is saying that they are targeted towards heavier sailors having more grunt to get up and go. In response to windwarriors post.
This is the dumbest marketing fad in a while.. the fact that they actually need to explain: S = 4.2 , M = 4.7 etc. is just silly. In essence what they are saying is: "We want you to buy an entire set of sails, masts and booms from us".
severne have openly said they design their sails for people in the 80kg range.
but yeah, i agree, sail companies need sailors at the heavy end of the scale also.
just areas with decent waves, and consistent x/offshore wind.
im trying to workout if the S is a 4.2 or 3.7 ??
Interesting but it's nothing new for Naish. The very first boxxer was super compact and the whole range rigged on a 400, even the 6.3. Over the years the Boxxer has become less compact as I don't think those first ones really sailed that well, this looks like a step back towards boxxer 1.0.
RE why it works, I think what Robby was trying to say was that the sail is designed to run a lot less twist effectively allowing you to do away with that 'useless' top half a panel. I don't really see how this has been achieved as supporting a head that large is difficult; a batten can only do so much. No doubt compact, to a degree, is the go though, everyone has been on that path for a while.
Oh and yeah, the sizing system is retarded...also only in Maui is an XL a 5.3 hahahaha.
It seems to follow the same concept as the Goya Banzai and I would actually believe what they're saying a seeing the Goya Banzai in use. (I've seen people use a 4.9 in less than 15knts of wind when most guys were on 5.8s).
The point about them being like the first Boxer could be true through, I would say it may not sail the best (it does look very square) - like the first boxer (that said, Kauli Seadi still ripped on one). Although after a few years of evolution, it should become better and probably a good sail (like the boxer and the fly which was adapted from it)
great looking sail
personal taste - i'm glad they did away with the skull/crossbones thingy
are they the same material as last year and the new severnes?
Cant wait for some bunnys to lay there hard earned on the line and give us the results! We dont get real wind in Qld so its going to have to be other states!
They will either be great and revolutionary and others will follow or they will be a fad/flop, I'm hoping for great.
They are most definatly onto something here, and R.Naish is no fool, I'm sure he's made more money out of kiting & SUP than windsurfing , so they are thinking 'how can we simplify things' how can we make this sport more attractive again and make it easier to say 'yes' and not be bamboozled by the mindless amount and variation of sails just in each brand let alone other brands, they have seen how simple Kiteing gear is and Sup also, if they can do similar for windsurfing that will be a great thing for the sport.
And if they get more sail/sales so what, great.
1 mast/boom 3-4 sails, why not? that should be perfectly achievable, Challenge is now do the same in freeride/slalom!
We are so over complex, over technical as sport, and that sucks and is what keeps people away, even scares current sailors away, anything that puts the focuss more on the sailing and less on the gear is a good thing.
I think I counted over 100 different model sails on one brands website alone, and thats just this seasons, how do you explain that to someone keen on getting into the sport?
I hope the concept has wings, because it could only end up in more development down the 'simplification line' , which is a good thing, from a manufacturers view it would have to be better also, that is unless they want to sell us something 'that just does this little thing just a bit better than that little thing, which of course does it a bit better than last year! hmmm lets hope this 'chopper' is not just an example of marketing BS at its greatest. Technically it makes sense, but it all really comes down to how does it sail? how does it feel? And does super light really mean, lucky to last a year?
Let us know, when someone sails one!, the video sells it well thats for sure!
Can't wait til they do S - M - L - XL with their race sails
Somebody will have a M wavesail and buy a L freeride..... ending up with a quiver of 4.7 and 8.0
Not sure how it sails but it should be pretty light, for starters you save about .7kg on the XL just by using a 370 rather than a 430.