and something slightly more serious.
This was written and released in the Australian a few days before the Fanning incident.
And if you cant tell me what a normal distribution is whether it skewed and what the SD is then please don't quote statistics cause you don't understand them
I've pasted the first paragraph and added the link for the rest.
The basis is that after Fifteen fatals in Australia since 2010, and 51 bites since 2012 or triple the 50-year average we need to manage the problem? There are numerous solutions be interesting to see where this discussion ends up.
Shark culling vs. shark attacks: has our admiration gone too far? www.theaustralian.com.au/nocookies?a=A.flavipes <div class="story-intro">
Great white sharks have been protected in all Australian waters since 1998. The first male great whites born into that protection reached maturity eight to 10 years ago, and their female counterparts started maturing in 2010. In the meantime, the surviving juveniles born before 1998 presumably also mated. The consequences of this protection arguably are being felt in human casualties, which are increasing dramatically.There have been 15 fatalities in Australia since August 2010 (and 51 injuries since 2012), which is more than triple the average for the past 50 years, according to the Australian Shark Attack File kept by the Taronga Conservation Society. Unofficially, there may be more. When people go missing at sea — as 25-year-old Martyn Tann did off Mullaloo Beach, Perth, in 2013 — their fate is not always recorded as shark-related, even if the missing person is known to be a good swimmer.Of the known fatal attacks, at least five were, or were suspected to be, perpetrated by great whites. You don’t need to be a statistician to suspect a correlation. Some are asking if it is time to lift the great white’s protected status. Have great whites — and, for that matter, tigers and bulls, which make up some of the other fatal attackers — reached numbers that may require more diligent management?