^^ would install with divers so low-ish materials cost but probably high installation costs depending on whether they air lift first to bed it down in a trench, or use pegs/anchors initially until the sand comes over it as well.

agree that it is worth a shot given the low impact and ease of removal if it doesn't work or breaks up. i think the City of Albany might be exploring this option for the emu point end of middleton beach, to replicate the old kelp beds that used to be offshore there and had a surfable wave from them as well as reducing wave energy/erosion on the beach. haven't seen any design info though.


should write to geofabrics australia and see what sort of funds it would take to fabriate say 50sqm worth and see if you can crowd fund it for a trial...

www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/subiaco-oval-could-be-turned-into-120m-urban-surfing-wave-park-ng-81ad83f329ca6bc14899cabfb87892c3

This looks good, if they do it.

And if it doesn't spend all its time broken down.

Would be great...but I think one of the commenters on the story make a good point about Perth's lack of fresh water. Then goes onto making a much better suggestion of building one in the Swan River. Look how much parking space they provide in the plan for artists impression of the Subi idea, looks like the typical parking space allocated for any public/private facility in that area...if they built one in the swan, they could let the wave flush out & have fresh water flow in to prevent stagnation. So you wouldn't have to worry about spending heaps on chlorinating such a huge body of water & you wouldn't have to keep topping up the water level with scheme water. Maybe put it down near the train station & incorporate it into that revitalization project they're got going already.

I love the muppets who write this stuff up - it cracks me up. The Superbank is one hell of a crowded place for a surf and gets its fair share of visitors but apparently this new park in Perf will be even more busy

"He said the all-year round Wavegarden had the potential to bring 300,000 visitors to ­Subiaco each year"


Wow - thats like 821 per day ! Where are they all coming from? Bit of doubling counting one would imagine How man of these will be surfing? How may waves per hour will be coming through ?

They'll probably end up throwing 20 people in at a time and let sort it out.. I.e - whoever is the deepest gets the wave. Would be a good idea to reinforce surf etiquette by banning people who drop in

Do you honestly think that residents of Subiaco are going to allow the development of a public wavepool? Typical perthnow attempt at clickbait journalism. Anyone who lives or has lived in Subiaco knows that the area has become very insular and most residents cannot wait for the new stadium to be built at Burswood so that finally the suburb can be rid of the influx of humanity on weekends during the AFL season.

Select to expand quote

Hamsta said..
Do you honestly think that residents of Subiaco are going to allow the development of a public wavepool? Typical perthnow attempt at clickbait journalism. Anyone who lives or has lived in Subiaco knows that the area has become very insular and most residents cannot wait for the new stadium to be built at Burswood so that finally the suburb can be rid of the influx of humanity on weekends during the AFL season.

100%

Select to expand quote

bene313 said..

Hamsta said..
Do you honestly think that residents of Subiaco are going to allow the development of a public wavepool? Typical perthnow attempt at clickbait journalism. Anyone who lives or has lived in Subiaco knows that the area has become very insular and most residents cannot wait for the new stadium to be built at Burswood so that finally the suburb can be rid of the influx of humanity on weekends during the AFL season.

100%

But they will lose out (foot traffic + pubs) with no football and nothing to replace it. Most people that go to the Subi for the footy would never go there other wise.

Im not saying that you are wrong but if thats the case they are not thinking long term.

Parking will be a problem and noise as well.

Sounds good but I cant see it happening.

Select to expand quote

DARTH said..

bene313 said..

Hamsta said..
Do you honestly think that residents of Subiaco are going to allow the development of a public wavepool? Typical perthnow attempt at clickbait journalism. Anyone who lives or has lived in Subiaco knows that the area has become very insular and most residents cannot wait for the new stadium to be built at Burswood so that finally the suburb can be rid of the influx of humanity on weekends during the AFL season.

100%

But they will lose out (foot traffic + pubs) with no football and nothing to replace it. Most people that go to the Subi for the footy would never go there other wise.

Im not saying that you are wrong but if thats the case they are not thinking long term.

Parking will be a problem and noise as well.

Sounds good but I cant see it happening.

Subi council has recently taken steps to alleviate parking issues by cutting ties with Wilson parking, freeing up a fair bit of space. But there is no way the surf idea will be approved - especially with multi-storey apartments. Subi is far too conservative.

Select to expand quote

DARTH said..

But they will lose out (foot traffic + pubs) with no football and nothing to replace it. Most people that go to the Subi for the footy would never go there other wise.

Im not saying that you are wrong but if thats the case they are not thinking long term.

Parking will be a problem and noise as well.

Sounds good but I cant see it happening.

Subi has it's issues for local business and the footy ending is icing on the cake.

The residents' sentiment doesn't help. Eg. opposition to new small bars/restaurants and development generally.

Earlier in the year the old pavilion development was approved despite a backlash from residents and fierce opposition from City of Subiaco itself! The pavillion has been deserted since 2007!

au.news.yahoo.com/subiaco-tower-a-game-changer-26436171.html

So it took a decade to make a decision just to build some apartments + mixed use on the old pavillion site. How can we expect a ginormous wave pool to be be approved in this century

Select to expand quote

bene313 said..

DARTH said..


But they will lose out (foot traffic + pubs) with no football and nothing to replace it. Most people that go to the Subi for the footy would never go there other wise.

Im not saying that you are wrong but if thats the case they are not thinking long term.

Parking will be a problem and noise as well.

Sounds good but I cant see it happening.

Subi has it's issues for local business and the footy ending is icing on the cake.

The residents' sentiment doesn't help. Eg. opposition to new small bars/restaurants and development generally.

Earlier in the year the old pavilion development was approved despite a backlash from residents and fierce opposition from City of Subiaco itself! The pavillion has been deserted since 2007!

au.news.yahoo.com/subiaco-tower-a-game-changer-26436171.html

So it took a decade to make a decision just to build some apartments + mixed use on the old pavillion site. How can we expect a ginormous wave pool to be be approved in this century

I really think its the wrong place to do it. As you said the fun police will kill it

Subi tower huh?

Also $120 mil, huh?

Is there $120 mil allotted for some kind of, nay, any kind of development in the area? Or am I being cynical way too early?

Long term, a fascinating idea is the wave pool, a virtually guaranteed earner for years to come, provided the investors don't get too greedy and out-price it for the average punter a la Rotto.

Would be more beneficial to allocate these funds towards more artificial reefs

Select to expand quote

bene313 said..
Earlier in the year the old pavilion development was approved despite a backlash from residents and fierce opposition from City of Subiaco itself! The pavillion has been deserted since 2007!

au.news.yahoo.com/subiaco-tower-a-game-changer-26436171.html

So it took a decade to make a decision just to build some apartments + mixed use on the old pavillion site.

That's because that tower broke a number of local planning rules and is totally out of character. It took Colin's idiot planning minister forcing them by changing the law and overruling/bulldozing Subiaco to allow it.

Select to expand quote

Legion said...

bene313 said..
Earlier in the year the old pavilion development was approved despite a backlash from residents and fierce opposition from City of Subiaco itself! The pavillion has been deserted since 2007!

au.news.yahoo.com/subiaco-tower-a-game-changer-26436171.html

So it took a decade to make a decision just to build some apartments + mixed use on the old pavillion site.

That's because that tower broke a number of local planning rules and is totally out of character. It took Colin's idiot planning minister forcing them by changing the law and overruling/bulldozing Subiaco to allow it.

Perhaps but, local business desperately needs it. And Perth generally needs urban infill and higher density living (rather than sprawl).