Back to top

Kalama Performance

Created by 1fox 1fox  > 9 months ago, 25 Sep 2021
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
JonathanC
JonathanC

VIC

1024 posts

5 May 2022 6:43pm
Apologies for going off topic .. 1Fox would love to hear your thoughts on 9x26 Starboard
pohaku
pohaku

NSW

883 posts

5 May 2022 7:56pm
AUS crew, for Kalama longboard style SUPs theres the following left for pre order:9'0 x 28 at 108L - both colours
9'2 x 30 at 126L - none
10' x 28 at 121L - 2 orange 1 blue
10'2 x 32 at 160L - 1 blue
1fox
1fox

184 posts

6 May 2022 4:48am
Select to expand quote
JonathanC said..
Apologies for going off topic .. 1Fox would love to hear your thoughts on 9x26 Starboard


To set the baseline, let me refer that the board I ride the most is a sunova custom longsup 9x26.5 90lts. That board is just. perfect!I bought the starboard as a backup board. what appealed to me? the low rocker line and the starboard reliability/ finish quality.

What I found out afterall:The board has a very easily perceived quality.the deck is quite flat which i'm not fan.
The rails are relatively thin and the fin placement is good. Added to the diamond tail, translates into a very lively off the tail behaviour. That's one of the best things about the board.
The major drawback of this blue carbon construction is the lack of flex. This is a relevant problem for me.
Maybe it's because i'm spoiled by sunova.
fester
fester

WA

350 posts

15 May 2022 7:14pm
Select to expand quote
pohaku said..
AUS crew, for Kalama longboard style SUPs theres the following left for pre order:9'0 x 28 at 108L - both colours
9'2 x 30 at 126L - none
10' x 28 at 121L - 2 orange 1 blue
10'2 x 32 at 160L - 1 blue


So no 9'2" Kalama's left in this shipment ?
1fox
1fox

184 posts

16 May 2022 6:37am
During last week I had the chance to test the board, both in small waves and punchy point break.
It worked great on both.

The volume is a bit too much for what I'm used to: 120 vs 90lts. You could surf with your office suit and still come out relatively dry :D
The problems I found in the new deal are not present here. the rocker is well balanced, the tail is thin enough for a incisive bite, but still large enough to carry out the proper volume.
If you stomp on the the tail in a big bottom it will follow nimble (for a 10')
The setup I enjoyed the most was quad, like my nalu LE.It has proper flex, is light and looks reliable.
The board is definitely a keeper.
justaddwater
justaddwater

NSW

763 posts

16 May 2022 8:38am
9.0 ish x30 ish 120 -125 ish IMO numbers that a lot of people can relate to ,they,sell quickly.Particularly in a longboard format !
Emeboy
Emeboy

NSW

399 posts

17 May 2022 4:49pm
Select to expand quote
1fox said..
During last week I had the chance to test the board, both in small waves and punchy point break.
It worked great on both.

The volume is a bit too much for what I'm used to: 120 vs 90lts. You could surf with your office suit and still come out relatively dry :D
The problems I found in the new deal are not present here. the rocker is well balanced, the tail is thin enough for a incisive bite, but still large enough to carry out the proper volume.
If you stomp on the the tail in a big bottom it will follow nimble (for a 10')
The setup I enjoyed the most was quad, like my nalu LE.It has proper flex, is light and looks reliable.
The board is definitely a keeper.


Sounds awesome 1fox!!! Still frothing for mine to arrive.... hopefully within the month.

Good things take time so they say....
pohaku
pohaku

NSW

883 posts

24 May 2022 1:17pm
Select to expand quote
fester said..

pohaku said..
AUS crew, for Kalama longboard style SUPs theres the following left for pre order:9'0 x 28 at 108L - both colours
9'2 x 30 at 126L - none
10' x 28 at 121L - 2 orange 1 blue
10'2 x 32 at 160L - 1 blue



So no 9'2" Kalama's left in this shipment ?


All sold
fester
fester

WA

350 posts

28 Jun 2022 2:26pm
Any reviews or Pic's of the new Kalama's yet?
Rossall
Rossall

WA

727 posts

29 Jun 2022 3:37pm



Emeboy
Emeboy

NSW

399 posts

1 Jul 2022 9:17pm
Select to expand quote
fester said..
Any reviews or Pic's of the new Kalama's yet?


August Fester.. Fingers crossed
pohaku
pohaku

NSW

883 posts

12 Jul 2022 9:37pm
Global shipping delays.. Fun times. They're on the way tho!
Rossall
Rossall

WA

727 posts

16 Jul 2022 3:39pm
Jesus is the ship going via Rotterdam? Vietnam to Australia shouldn't take that long even if it's going via Singapore. What Freight Forwarder are you using ?
jrc22ski
jrc22ski

62 posts

18 Jul 2022 12:23am
Anyone have experience with the Kalama 9'0"x28"/108L.

I ride an 8'2" Speeed and weigh 175#'s - looking for something with a little more volume & glide for winter.

TIA
Emeboy
Emeboy

NSW

399 posts

19 Jul 2022 1:41pm
Select to expand quote
Rossall said..
Jesus is the ship going via Rotterdam? Vietnam to Australia shouldn't take that long even if it's going via Singapore. What Freight Forwarder are you using ?






pohaku
pohaku

NSW

883 posts

20 Jul 2022 1:52pm
Select to expand quote
jrc22ski said..
Anyone have experience with the Kalama 9'0"x28"/108L.

I ride an 8'2" Speeed and weigh 175#'s - looking for something with a little more volume & glide for winter.

TIA


i'll have one once they arrive. i have a ETA but will know more in a few days. haha yeah iv got it coming on a peddle boat
Emeboy
Emeboy

NSW

399 posts

12 Aug 2022 10:41pm
Well the time has come.. No fault of Dyl and the crew but it has been exactly 365 days since I first enquired about getting one of these weapons.. And it arrived tonight.
So, an early review on the first impressions.

the board was packed awesomely for shipping. double boxed. Polystyrene sheets down both sides and wrapped in a soft fabric sleeve! Prefect condition on arrival.

First thing.. It's light!! I got the 10x28 @121 ltrs and baked it weighed in at 7.4kg. It's tough!! You can feel the outer skin is tough as and there is not one blemish on the board. superb finish!

The nose rocker is there but not too abrupt. classic longboard style.. The kick in the tail is quite pronounced so I am picking this thing will turn on a dime with the smallest amount of weight on the back foot. The nose and tail have been well thinned out so I am expecting the response to be epic.

Fin placement is interesting.. I will try as a thruster first but the quad configuration sees the trailer fins set close to centre and almost parallel.. First time using the FCS2 system.. I'll hold judgement on that for now.

The underside has a smooth single concave right through the full length of the board and only flattens out right back at the rear fin box.
I've got the rail tape and deck grip on (Van der Waal hex traction.. Good gear) so we are good for launch early tomorrow... I'll post my thoughts on how she goes once I have a few waves on the clock.. But for now I am epically stoked to have this beauty in my quiver!!!!














Rossall
Rossall

WA

727 posts

13 Aug 2022 11:44am
Looks bloody awesome
colas
colas

5370 posts

13 Aug 2022 9:32pm
Select to expand quote
Emeboy said..
Fin placement is interesting.. I will try as a thruster first but the quad configuration sees the trailer fins set close to centre and almost parallel..




That's what is called a "McKee setup". Basically it provides a kind of hybrid between a thruster and a quad.
It allows using either 80/20 or 70/30 rear fins for better grip in turns, or go with symmetrical (50/50) rears for a smoother rail to rail (my preference).

www.mckeesurf.com/wp/?page_id=267

"Mckee's 'Width between back fins' formula, is calculated to give the most fluid and redirectional interchange between turns while maintaining drive, eliminating tracking, rail grab and the need for baby back fins, all associated with having fins too close to the rail. In the past l have placed fins in hundreds of different positions all over the tail."
pohaku
pohaku

NSW

883 posts

14 Aug 2022 10:18pm
Amazing Paul. I used my 9' x 28 at 108L yesterday in one foot rip bowl. Let's just say my mind is blown. I called DK straight after he was frothing. My board weighs under 7kg and is bulletproof.






Emeboy
Emeboy

NSW

399 posts

15 Aug 2022 11:56am
Select to expand quote
colas said..

Emeboy said..
Fin placement is interesting.. I will try as a thruster first but the quad configuration sees the trailer fins set close to centre and almost parallel..





That's what is called a "McKee setup". Basically it provides a kind of hybrid between a thruster and a quad.
It allows using either 80/20 or 70/30 rear fins for better grip in turns, or go with symmetrical (50/50) rears for a smoother rail to rail (my preference).

www.mckeesurf.com/wp/?page_id=267

"Mckee's 'Width between back fins' formula, is calculated to give the most fluid and redirectional interchange between turns while maintaining drive, eliminating tracking, rail grab and the need for baby back fins, all associated with having fins too close to the rail. In the past l have placed fins in hundreds of different positions all over the tail."


Thanks Colas....
Even more keen to see how it goes as a quad now....

Only had small (but clean) waves on the weekend but can definitely feel the performance factor. brilliant deckpad with plenty of grip and feels super solid up on the nose.... loving it!!!
nShoreSlider
nShoreSlider

43 posts

25 Aug 2022 10:25pm
Just ordered a 9'2 x 30 for myself. Hoping it can get shipped quickly so I can try it out in the fall swells we get here in New England. Any other folks have this board in the states? Any reviews on the 9'2 specifically? I've been riding a Jimmy Lewis Destroyer MP 8'5 for the past two years and loving it, but am looking for a little more length (that's what she said).
nShoreSlider
nShoreSlider

43 posts

26 Aug 2022 9:12pm
Select to expand quote
pohaku said..
Amazing Paul. I used my 9' x 28 at 108L yesterday in one foot rip bowl. Let's just say my mind is blown. I called DK straight after he was frothing. My board weighs under 7kg and is bulletproof



I was so tempted by the 9'0 but got nervous about the 28" width and the low volume for my 5'11" @ 85kg lump of human flesh so I went with the 9'2x30. Stoked to receive it!

I see you went 2+1 or thruster - what sizes did you run? How did they go? I've read reviews of people insisting this board is a bummer as a thruster but mind-blowing as a quad. Let me know!
margeaux
margeaux

QLD

59 posts

27 Aug 2022 9:26am
Hi nshore
I own a 9'2/30 and stoked on how it performs as a quad I have never tried it as thruster I'm using the Harley ingelby quads. At 100kg I find the board super stable, it has great glide for its length, not corky and very responsive. Dave has done an amazing job on volume distribution it's placed in all the right spots, there are a lot of subtle differences between this and other boards I've owned, there's some something special going on with that 3 stage rocker square tail and quad set up that makes this board a keeper. The construction is super light and strong with a nice flex .
Enjoy and share the stoke
jrc22ski
jrc22ski

62 posts

27 Aug 2022 7:42pm
I just ordered the 9' x 28" / 108L and I too am looking for fin suggestions.

I weigh 170 #'s.
nShoreSlider
nShoreSlider

43 posts

29 Aug 2022 9:04pm
Select to expand quote
margeaux said..
Hi nshore
I own a 9'2/30 and stoked on how it performs as a quad I have never tried it as thruster I'm using the Harley ingelby quads. At 100kg I find the board super stable, it has great glide for its length, not corky and very responsive. Dave has done an amazing job on volume distribution it's placed in all the right spots, there are a lot of subtle differences between this and other boards I've owned, there's some something special going on with that 3 stage rocker square tail and quad set up that makes this board a keeper. The construction is super light and strong with a nice flex .
Enjoy and share the stoke


This is all very exciting to hear - thanks for the insight. I'm headed to the airport to pick mine up today. Can't wait to lay my hands on this thing. It will actually be my first new board... I've only bought used boards in the past. Glad it sounds like a keeper.

From my memory you have/had a JL Destroyer 8'5? That's been my primary board for the past two years. The Kalama is a different size and shape obviously, but I'm curious how you would see using one versus the other? I'm going to give the Kalama some serious time on the water and then see if I end up missing my Destroyer or if there's no need for it anymore. Just surmising...
jrc22ski
jrc22ski

62 posts

2 Sep 2022 5:36am
I did FCS Shaper Series AM in MED.






nShoreSlider
nShoreSlider

43 posts

3 Sep 2022 2:17am
Select to expand quote
jrc22ski said..





It looks like your rails have a brushed carbon look where the orange/red was sanded down to reveal some of the carbon beneath. Did it come like that or did you sand it down? My rails are solid orange/red. I ask because I just put my first little paddle ding in my right rail (behind where I put the rail tape, bummer) and I see the black carbon beneath it. So now I'm wondering if I should sand it down so I'm not bothered by future dings/chips in the topcoat. I should probably not care, but it's my first new board so I'm babying it right now!
jrc22ski
jrc22ski

62 posts

3 Sep 2022 5:21am
Select to expand quote
nShoreSlider said..

jrc22ski said..





It looks like your rails have a brushed carbon look where the orange/red was sanded down to reveal some of the carbon beneath. Did it come like that or did you sand it down? My rails are solid orange/red. I ask because I just put my first little paddle ding in my right rail (behind where I put the rail tape, bummer) and I see the black carbon beneath it. So now I'm wondering if I should sand it down so I'm not bothered by future dings/chips in the topcoat. I should probably not care, but it's my first new board so I'm babying it right now!

No sanding. This is how the board arrived.
justaddwater
justaddwater

NSW

763 posts

3 Sep 2022 2:18pm
Im not that interested in most quad set ups! But the McKee quad set up ,look absolutely right on this design !!!
Loading more posts...
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site