Select to expand quote
JeanG said...
Area10,
Great points, but please allow me to play devil's advocate:
Racers need to be at the cutting edge of performance. Recreational paddlers don't. Thus even if racers constitute 5% of the customers, they'll get 90% of the shapes: Diff race shapes for diff conditions, diff paddlers, diff capabilities.
Conversely, 90% of rec paddlers can ride the same 14x28/29 shape. There's less need to offer an extensive quiver of incremental sizes and shapes.
I'm very happy for anyone to play devil's advocate.
So here's a thought for you in return. Why do you make the assumption that recreational paddlers are happy with second-rate shapes, or have any less demanding a set of criteria than "racers"? I don't accept that at all. A good shape is a good shape, and so-called recreational paddlers (who in reality are usually occasional racers) often paddle in a WIDER variety of conditions than racers. Racing is in fact awfully limiting if a variety of paddling experiences is your aim. A typical paddling week of a semi-serious racer will involve huge amounts of repetition of the same activity and the issue for racers is often of finding ways of making all the drills exciting. Most races are held in a pretty narrow set of conditions. But a typical semi-serious or serious rec paddler (by which I mean someone who will paddle eg. 3-7 times a week) will typically deliberately aim for variety because fun is their aim, not beating other people, and variety is fun. Most of the people I paddle with are rec paddlers. We will paddle perfectly flat water one session, surf the next, downwind the next day, go on a river the next, take out newbies the day after that etc. All of us have multiple boards to allow us to do this huge variety of activities. We don't want crap boards. We want cutting-edge designs too, just like the racers. But we want them at a sensible price and we will pay for adaptability, and we don't want something so tippy, fragile, or specialised that it will limit our ability to do what we want.
DJ is what I think of when I think of a prototypical rec paddler. We are addicted. We care about our equipment deeply: often the gear is part of the fun. We will have multiple boards if they allow us to do more, or do more comfortably or safely. The enjoyment of the experience of paddling is the aim (rather than the experience of beating someone else). And you can't enjoy paddling something that is a dire design or is unsuited to the conditions.
In fact in many ways I think the rec paddler (and I distinguish between rec paddlers and occasional or casual ones) is MORE discerning than their racing counterparts, because racers are willing to put up with any manner of torture or ownership/financial woes just as long as they feel the board is "fast". In other words they have a narrower and less exacting set of criteria than the keen recreational paddler.
Overall, what I am highlighting here is that there is a new demographic of paddler that is occurring in our sport, and I don't think they are being well-catered for. These are people who are addicted to the sport, and may paddle as many hours a week as keen racers (in fact, often they paddle more, since racing is quite limiting in terms of recovery days etc) and are very knowledgeable and experienced, but they don't race often - or at all. This group of people probably represents the majority of people who contribute to these sorts of forums I reckon, and probably the majority of people who will be in the market for a 12-6 or (especially) a 14 or UL. But I think that the designers are mostly not listening to us, only a tiny number of elite racers.