Select to expand quote
hilly said..emmafoils said..Raleigh said..
Anyone have any experience comparing the 2400 V2 with the 1850? I see a few 1850 comments here on this 2400 thread but no direct comparison.
Huge difference in low end. The 2400 just wants to come up. Trade off is that it is a lot slower and draggy.
Disagree with low end. I can get up really early with the 1850 that is why I sold my 2400.
Not everyone may need the low end of the 2400...agreed. But the 2400 has much better low end than the 1850.
When I got my 1850 I liked it so much I used it exclusively for around 40 sessions and thought I was done with the 2400. The other day was very light and I used the 2400 just to see what it felt like because it had been awhile (didn't change anything else in the setup) I was amazed at how much more lift it has. Yes, it is bulky and slow but it has tons more low end lift than the 1850.
Larger SA, lower AR and much, much thicker.....it absolutely has better low end. Or are the rules of hydrodynamics different in the antipodes?