Select to expand quote
r13 said..Guitz said..Azure305 said..r13 said..Yes assumed as much - lean and strong, resourceful, always had a plan B.
The name Alcheringa tweaked a memory cell - see the first one in the 66 Hobart. As per the programme at the below link below stock up on your Craven Filter and go buy your Renault car when you get back..............
archive.cyca.com.au/media/3435156/1966-sydney-hobart-official-programme.pdfTop story there re Alf and Badger Island.
Not fir me - i want to put on a 'Bonds Yachtie', get me an 'AWA Teleradio 65', and fly home on 'TAA' !
Yeeeha!



I have an old EMI solid state radio that came with my boat. Looks to be early 60's. But that AWA teleradio valve job is a treat! I do a bit of recording and have some nice old AWA gear, and some Byer and Rolla Valve mic preamps that came from the ABC mono tape recorders that were built for the 56 olympics. I recorded Chain, Kev Borich, Mick Rudd of Spectrum, and a few others with the old vintage gear i have.
Greato but are you still wearing your Bonds Yachtie gear, or flying TAA.............maybe to the first, definitely not to the second........won't go further as regards other airlines we won't be flying with soon..............
I get where you are coming from and agree especially with respect to safety measures dotting every i and crossing every t.....
and ensuring an old hull won't spring a plank or spew it's caulking when it hits bad weather. That said many a good looking wooden boat has some very suspect weakness and many a tired looking wooden boat are as solid as they are meant to be. It's the condition under the paint that counts! So it's a necessity that you know your boat well and wooden boats in general. If you have been around wooden boats for a long time as this bloke has indicated, you will know what to look out for. So I'm not saying he didn't make mistakes but it's an unfair stretch to call the boat junk on looks alone. On looks I wouldn't take that boat to sea.
Also I think my take on owning a wooden boat is to make the best of new and old engineering and tech as appropriate and seek advise from those with a lot of proven runs on the board.
While on the subject of AWA valve radios and vintage equipment as an illustration, in my professional recording experience nothing yet in the digital domain can replace the way some vintage tools of the trade happen to work, often by accidental design artifacts that most tech designers try to avoid in pursuit of accurate audio capture and reproduction. The way inductor equalisation sounds with sweet high frequency adjustment and solid bass projection, nothing comes close. And contrary to most people's knowledge or lack of, the desired sound of valve topology is usually not the valve itself but rather the transformer being used in the signal path and the mumetal contained along with the wire winding used. This is the black art of audio and the old Australian designed and built recording gear is outstanding in this aspect. Many of the great recording engineers of the world have the old mono AWA vari mu broadcast limiters in their recording rack. I have some of the best gear built in Oz during the hey day of the 60's and early 70's that was custom built by a world leader at the time, and his team here in Melbourne Graham Thirkle. This was before electronic balancing of the input and output signal replaced transformers in the signal path. My point being some things from the past are irreplaceable in the modern world and have a place while we can get our hands on them and keep them functional and in good order ( while not putting your life at risk). I think we are to a point all on the same page?