Interesting post. I've been doing a lot of research into the history of sailing design and one thing that's interesting is that sailors have created so many myths that are negative to other sailors; for example, in dinghies there are many tales about how innovative designs were resisted by sailors of yore. In fact, that really hasn't happened all that much, and the resistance has been created just as much by people like skiff sailors (who like to pretend that they are more forward-thinking) as by 'the establishment' that many people like to blame.
Take Nat Herreshoff's catamaran, for example. There have been many tales about how she was banned after winning one race and that ban stopped cats from being developed around the world, but it simply didn't happen. These days internet archives allow us to look at the reports of regattas and we can see quite clearly that cats were NOT banned after Herreshoff's Amaryllis took part in that first race. In fact fleets of cats raced in several places, and they were treated just like everything else.
And yet people have been carping on for years in print and in club bars about the supposed ban, and when it's pointed out that there is incontrovertible evidence that it didn't occur, they get upset. They can't seem to live in a world where there are no big bad bogeyman to blame and to feel superior about.
At a guess, the self-concept of many people is bound up in their choice of boat. People who buy a "salty" type might feel that they are independent, tough-minded no-nonsense guys who are above the frippery of modern boats, and that modern boats are only bought by consumerist daysailers or fools. The guys who buy modern boats feel that they are innovative, nimble thinkers and that the guys with gaffers are just stick in the muds. It's not about the boat, it's about the owner's self image, and that's all but impossible to change.
And then there are people like me, who are arrogant enough to think that we can stand above all this stuff, and can't get off the fence because we can't condemn any type!
The thing I find interesting is that there are extremely smart, successful and knowledgeable people who like very different boats. It's obviously not a matter in which the more experienced sailors all sail one type or the other, and it's not a case where people who are objectively smart sail one type or the other. I've met very cluey people cruising on cats, heavy displacement timber boats, steel gaffers, and stripped-out IOR lightweight racers.
Surely personal taste matters in boats as much as it does in travelling on land, where some people hike, some people ride heavy touring bicycles, some ride ultralight backpacking bicycles, some hitchhike, and some use motor homes. There's no "ideal" boat any more than there is an ideal way of travelling on land.
Personally, my dream boat is getting smaller, which is unusual. As I understand the physics, in general;
Interior space increases by the square;
Speed increases by a factor of the square root (so big boats are proportionately slower, in general);
Displacement increases by the cube;
Costs increase at the same rate as displacement.
These days we're looking at a lightweight 36 footer when we move to full-time cruising, but we find the lightweight 28'er so good for weekend cruising that we'll probably hang onto it for when we return to living ashore.
'Scuse the rant, I'm just trying to postpone taking the dogs for a walk.