Select to expand quote
twodogs1969 said..
Mb
as your boat is a mast head like mine did the rig need any strengthening? Did you have to reinforce the deck?
I should start off by saying that MB is a most over rigged and over engineered boat so has inherent strength. If your boat is more lightly made this might not apply, some of the masts on round the cans boats are like matchsticks, but the principle is still right.
If you google it or talk to a few riggers you will find that provided the inner stay is attached to the mast within 10% of the outer stay you won't need extra mast support. MB's mast is about 12 metres tall, my inner stay is about 60-75 cm below the outer stay, so about 5-7% below the outer stay. It has never bent or pumped.
Before I had my inner stay fitted I spoke with Kim Swarbrick who assured me the anchor locker bulkhead could easily take the strain. So far it has without difficulty.
I would hope a competent rigger/engineer wouldn't install it if it wasn't strong enough.
As I noted in an earlier post, a good furler and a sail made to suit it might mean you don't need an inner stay. MB can sail in high winds with the heady furled. It won't point at 50-55 degrees but it will still point at 70 degrees. It will be a very rare event that you are close on a lee shore in winds high enough that 70 degrees won't get you away. And maybe you shouldn't be there.
I think the case for or against the necessity of furlers has a lot to do with whether you have a good one already or you don't. Nobody who has a good one will do without it. Those who don't have a good one need to spend a fair whack of $$$ to get one so will obviously not be easily convinced and will have arguments against them.
Boat performance is, to me, the least of the arguments against a furler for a cruiser. MB doesn't lose much with the sail furled as compared to a hanked on sail. Cruisers get the best boat speed with minimal effort and what is lost to a partially furled sail is nothing. More is lost in other rig tuning that you ignore because you are too busy chatting or reading or sleeping or watching the waves or throwing up.
The posts here for and against furlers also seem to depend on where you sail. If coastal cruising where you might get caught out occasionally and would normally not have to battle the elements for very long, the consequences of the hazards of being on the foredeck are reduced. If you sail where you are days from shore the consequences of foredeck mishaps are much more serious.
The foredeck is a dangerous place to be in high winds and big seas on a short handed small boat. Going over the side is only one hazard. Getting knocked off your feet and dragged into solid fittings, losing your footing and suffering broken limbs and cuts and while getting wet is at the least uncomfortable, if it happens time after time it becomes dangerous.