Select to expand quote
omg said...
thanks, however, I have to argue that Spleene SPX is flying more to the edge than the REO and SPX also jumps better, so on the paper REO should cope better but it's the opposite?
Regarding the technique, that's right, I am not redirecting the kite enough, however, I am keeping the back line pressure on but perhaps not enough.
I am a bit bummed right now, as I was almost certain the REO was the one for me =/ Waveriding wise, it has really good qualities, but I the stability would be better.
Oh and I almost forgot; I was floating on my back in the water today in stable & constant 9ms (19 knots) wind and I tested this: first I sheet in a bit and then I sheet out, and the kite nosedives. I thought this wouldn't have happened but it did. Try if you don't believe me...
Still a bit depressed about this "stability" issue.
First thing i would check is the trim on the bar, are all 4 lines correct and equal length.
It sounds sounds like when you're on a jump you're landing at speed with the kite at 12 (or fairly high in the window) and without directing the kite back into the window, its the equivalent of overtaking the kite.
The Reo seems to sit fairly forward in the window so you may just be catching up to it. The Spleene may sit further back, deeper in the window so even at speed you don't quite catch it up, bit like the comment Big Eeezeee made about the switchblade.
The second comment about the lying in the water sounds like you being washed towards the kite while at 12, strong current maybe? With both of these issues the remedy lies in directing the kite back into the window, from the experience of seeing the Reo, even on a wave & riding fast towards it, the kite drifts back.
BUT would this happen with the kite at 12? Probably not, because the kite still need to be placed in the window to allow it to drift back otherwise you would just overtake it, causing it to Hindenburgh on top or behind you.