Select to expand quote
Paradox said..
Nothing much will change except our preparedness to respond next time it happens. Borders will shut quicker and much more focus will be made on immediate response to contain outbreaks before they spread. Stockpiles of ventilators and masks etc will be significant.
There will be a global effort to monitor, track and respond to future outbreaks in a much more timely manner.
People will look back at this and realise that the deaths from flu like disease this year will be below that of even normal years and the economic destruction from the responses was disproportional to the actual disease. Better modeling processes will be developed to ascertain the threat of new virisus and match a response to them.
The biggest threat we have is the overblown response to this virus creating resistance to strong measures if a truly bad virus gets out.
What do you define as a 'truly bad virus'?
Something like Ebola is as bad as it gets, but it kills the host too quickly, so its spread is limited. Therefore that's not going to go far.
The flu? Its already established.
What is the most likely scenario? A disease that is able to spread without symptoms and then killing people two weeks later. Covid19 is not exactly that, but its close enough for some people.
I do agree with you though that at the very least this is a way to pre-empt these sorts of threats in the future.