Select to expand quote
Bara said..mazdon said..Public servant is such a broad term, and then there is local, state and fed gov also further to Chris example, maybe you could clarify Bara?
im not sure it's fair at all to ask doctors, nurses, teachers, firies, police, main roads engineers, contracts officers etc who are on public sector contracts right now to take a pay cut. That might even deepen the cash flow crisis further?!
Also, they don't get big bonuses and pay hikes when times are good, but maybe they opt for that for the security when times are tough?
so complex


yeah ok some public servants are essential therefore all public servants should be treated as essential??
Dont think so
For the ones that arent theres gonna be between 1 and 2m unemployed and plenty of those would be happy to take a public service role for 30% less than the current pencil pushers doing it.
They wont be given a chance though.
Nah not buying your line about they are payed less but have job security either. The people i know in state and local govt are payed well and get plenty of perks and even bonuses. They have their cake and eat it too.
My favourite was a local govt CEO here who had an independent review of his package done where they compared his salary to a CEO of an equivalent size company (3000 employees) Came back he should be paid 1.2million which he then used to get a pay packet of 600k. ie 2 and a half times the local govt minister and more than the PM!
That then flowed down to his reports and so on. When the councilors queried it they were accused of bullying and the CEO went on stress leave (on full pay of course).
Funny, on another forum I go to there is a private-sector WA mining engineer who was saying that if he moved into government work he'd take a 30% or so pay cut and the permanency isn't worth it.
If you can look at "the people you know" then I'll do the same thing. I know people who took a 10-50% cut to move to the public sector. Sure, many in Canberra are overpaid for what they do but people with the same qualifications will normally earn more in the private sector than they do in the public sector. By the way, even 10% of federal public servants in Canberra these days are on contracts.
Even your own example shows that the independent reviewer said that the council CEO should be paid twice what he ended up getting. How does that show that he was overpaid in the first place? How much do you reckon you
should get paid to run an organisation of 3000 people?
The typical miner in Oz works for the private sector and earns twice what a nurse, normally working under government funding, earns. Are you saying that the nurse should take a cut to make up the pay of someone who earns $60k more than they do most of the time?
By the way, I was a sole trader or small business employee for about 90% of my working life so I have zero reason to be biased.