Without game reserves in Africa, there would be no incentive for land owners to protect large animals which regularly conflict with humans. There are people willing to pay money to legally shoot, large, healthy, and genuinely wild animals. This creates a value on those animals and their environment, so to continue to extract this value healthy ecosystems are maintained..
Game reserves also suffer far less poaching than national parks, and the rebounding population of the white rhino in SA is attributed to the legalisation of trophy hunting.
This is environmental management capitalism style.. It's crazy, I think trophy hunters are nuts, but trophy hunters are better than poachers and habitat destruction caused by farming..
I'm not worried as much about one lion (A popular lion from a national park, tragically and mistakenly shot) than I am with the extinction of the whole species.. And while hunting continues to bring in the dollars, the species is safe..
Lions used to be the most wildly distributed mammal on the planet, from Africa through Europe, Asian and all the way down to Peru, before humans replaced them. In Africa, it looks like they've found a way to co-exist. It's not perfect, but until those protesting the hunters can find a better solution, then the industry is needed. We've been doing it forever, it's probably in our blood. With no regulation, the lions have no hope..
Amazing Assyrian reliefs from 650BC.. They really catch the suffering of dying lions from 2500 years ago quite well,..
Imagine we find a 150 year old elephant, with trunk cancer, and it has 3 weeks to live. We have a Saudi Prince willing to pay 150k to shoot it. They money will go to rebuilding an elephant watering hole, and fighting off poachers... Seems like a good deal to me?
Does anybody deny that game reserves have the potential to keep wild populations going outside of national parks? Is there an alternative?