Maxm you have
entirely missed the point.
Alchohol intake for pregnant women should be thought of in the same way that weed, smack, nicotine already are, and more so, as it appears to be more harmful than those.
The facts and affects are alarming - I am not attempting to be alarming as such.
Bog down in details if you choose to but we all pass judgement (verbally or otherwise - if you want to clech your sphincter about it

) when we see a pregnant woman smoking and as time passes
you will one day find yourself doing the same when you see a pregnant lady having a 'harmless drink or two'.
Maxm, feel free to take the high ground and pretend you don't judge examples of bad parenting/nurturing if you like. Or be honest.

Geez. The syndrome
is real. The affects are out there. Argue about semantics all you like.. or wake up.
EDIT:
In answer to your legitimate question How much more harmful? Obviously you know it's ridiculous to attempt to put a percentage on the damage.
It is relatively early days in research (the problem was 1st taken seriously 30 yrs ago but ignored in the mainstream) as we have had our collective heads in the sand (or porcelain telephone) but it appears the results to date show
even moderate and infrequent alchohol intake is harmful. Unless of course you prefer a brain damaged child with physical indicators, lack of concentration, anger control, cognitive abilities etc etc etc etc.
So the safest bet is zero intake.
You don't have to believe me, but if you
really want to know the truth (rather than just be the bloke who stuck it to some random dood on Seabreeze) look for the facts and accept it is a real problem in our society.
BTW - I did not suggest ciggies are harmless. They are
less harmful than alchohol to an unborn child though.