Select to expand quote
Mr Milk said..FormulaNova said..
Which scenario is better for the country as a whole?
A) Joe Smith gets an antibody test and comes up positive and has to be isolated for 2 weeks, but he doesn't have Covid19
B) Joe Smith has Covid19 and is contagious but has refused to get tested and can pass it onto others
I don't understand why people are getting so caught up in this. Our success so far has made people apathetic to the dangers, and people are burying their heads in the sand.
Sure, no one wants to be in quarantine for 2 weeks, but no one wants to have the economy shutdown for 6 months either.
Its a no-brainer.
A few weeks ago you said that if you got infected you wouldn't care about the rest of the country. You thought that your personal right to treatment outweighed any collective cost/benefit consideration. Now you say that some other person's rights have to give way to the common good. Why the change?
Senor Milk, I think I know what you are talking about, but I think you are mixing up a few things...
I have stated before that I think my life is the most important thing to me, so there would be/should be no limit to the cost to keep me alive. This was in the context of some other people arguing that at some point the cost of one person's life is not more important than the rest of the economy so they should be written off as uneconomic.
I never said "If I got infected that I wouldn't care about the rest of the country". Quite the opposite in fact. I was one of the people calling for an immediate isolation to try and tame this thing. I would happily do the time if it meant a return to normality, and I still agree even though I hate isolation.
No one has to give away their right (to life) for the common good. That is a mistake on your part if you think that is what I have just said. Sure, someone has to go through a bit of discomfort in having a cotton tip jammed up their nose and into the back of their throat, but as far as I am aware the test is not terminal.
The only change I can see is that your understanding of what I wrote is not quite right. If people are behaving like babies and trying to argue a painful swab up the nose is beneath them, then maybe they ought to remember that they are part of a society and as such need to do things that they otherwise might not want to.
I did and still do, draw the line at killing people or condemning them to death because its economically convenient.