Select to expand quote
Chris6791 said.. actiomax said..
Yeah and if they fail just get the government to bail them out .
so they need massive profits when its good times to cover there losses. Lmfho
They don't pass on any rate reduction on credit cards.
Its why people are asking for a royal commission into banks
I can't remember the specifics but did the govt bail out our banks during the GFC, or did they bail out the Australian economy? there is a big difference between the two. As far as I can recall our banks didn't need the bail out that most other countries needed because of the regulatory controls and good management they already had. They're still operative the same way now as they did then but now they're being bashed (again) for it.
I'm one of those bunnies that never pays off my credit card but I don't blame the bank for own financial management, or lack of.
I saw a good story on what happened, but I can't remember exactly what the mechanism was. I think it was that the government provided a guarantee on funds that covered the local banks liabilities. This allowed the banks to continue to operate and continue getting funding.
There definitely was a guarantee to support the banks, but it is the fact it is there that provides the reassurance, so it was not actually called upon.
I think in reality they bailed out the banks and the economy together, as nothing good would have happened with the banks exposed.
I would also argue that the banks only had the minimum ratios that they could get away with. Lower ratios mean being able to lend more, which is what they always want to do, and I am not sure a bank cares about a run on itself, because at that point its kaput anyway.
I think if the banks are recording record profits, open up the banks to compete with international lending. Is that already possible or is there still some protection going on? The downside to that is what happened when people borrowed in foreign currency and then our dollar went down.