BWalnut forum posts in last 60 days

Show Edits
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
14 May 2026 1:47pm
Who's going to be the first person to try the S3 on a standard bar and not on the D handle?
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
14 May 2026 12:03pm
Holoholo said..
Any input from those who have been on S3 regarding the ease of collapse- meaning: line tension on the collapse at top half of its range, tendency to spin, ease to identify/grab the right lines as well as how it accordians? The 2 standout PWs Ive tried- Quest, Powerpack have had center 4 lines unite to a distinct single line. Seeing the spread on the A lines, wondering if any of the above is an issue?


It was annoying the day I tried it. But, the collapse is really clean and easy when you grab almost any combination of the A-Lines. I kept trying to grab all 4 and it was a struggle. When I just started randomly grabbing lines and stowing it fast I was happy.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
12 May 2026 3:33am
MidAtlanticFoil said..

CFL Foiler said..
Those that have ridden the S3 curious to hear if you were able to comfortably find a one handed riding position/grip. Sounds like if the handle continued the sweet spot would be in the middle of the D.

Full hand grip behind the handle sounds like too much backline tension for powered riding. Full hand on the outside D handle sounds like full depower and you need to use your fingers on the bar to power up.
Is riding with your hand inside the D Handle the comfortable one handed position or is it still providing a little to much rear line tension?



I can say that riding overpowered with one hand is not really doable with the S3 (without a harness). Under the sweet spot conditions, maybe riding with your hand just up against the D may be perfect. Just haven't had the chance to try yet.


Hooked in, 25-30 knots with the 3.4m was a dream. I was riding one handed pointing at friends, goofing off, it was STABLE and easy to ignore.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
12 May 2026 1:25am
MidAtlanticFoil said..
I tried out my 4.3M again today in honking 20-30MPH winds with my D Handle Spreader Line with my Stringfellow hook and it worked great! I was able to fly comfortably one handed on my heelside tack. Toeside was a bit slower and more cautious (13-15mph vs 9-10 mph). Really making me consider taking a couple days to learn switch stance.

I also can't wait to fly the wing in it's sweet spot lol.


Really looking forward to hearing if the sticky wingtips is an issue for the 4.2m or if that is primarily triggered at the 5.3m size.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
11 May 2026 3:50am
Can you try a standard 2 point windsurf loop? Connect to top center of D and just below the D as a rigid loop? Not sure when I will get to ride it again...
Reply in Topic: New AFS Tails
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
11 May 2026 12:50am
Tough spot.
For anyone new to AFS I would tell them that it isn't a low end brand. If you compare it to something like KT low end the AFS will lose every single time.
Here's a comparison of the smaller surf foils that touches on that:
www.wouzel.com/post/quick-comparison-afs-silk-code-x-kt-nomad
What you get from AFS is buttery smooth riding when at medium to high power. If you compare it back to back with the KT stuff you can sense the camber "noise" or "feedback" that isn't as smooth but gives insane low end.
For me, I've leaned on having super fast boards with my AFS stuff and good technique for takeoff in the bumps. I never found much difference in tail sizes for initial lift but can say the UG41 is a legendary tail vs the HA38 which I disliked all the way.
Jeroensurf might be able to help out with bigger size recommendations and I would love to hear how the new silk 1150 rides!
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
9 May 2026 10:53pm
It's awesome.
www.wouzel.com/post/first-turns-brm-s3-3-4m
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
9 May 2026 2:26pm
Oh and for what it's worth, the #1 trait noticed from this session is the upwind speed is insane on the s3. 2-3mph faster than usual upwind while maintaining my normal 90 degree angle. Easily the fastest upwind parawing I've ever used.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
9 May 2026 1:25pm
hilly said..

BWalnut said..
Got to try the 3.4 for a few hours today. Really good parawing. Trying to put together some notes on it. Any specific questions people have on it at the moment?



Back to back with PR V2?


I can do that chat when I get my 2.4 and 3.6 v2s. My buddy got the 2.7 and 3.4 S3 so the comparison will be readily available and size applicable.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
9 May 2026 12:26pm
Got to try the 3.4 for a few hours today. Really good parawing. Trying to put together some notes on it. Any specific questions people have on it at the moment?
Reply in Topic: AFS Fuselage
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
9 May 2026 4:38am
Yeah they tweaked the water column for turbulence reasons on it.


I haven’t been able to get a response from dealers or AFS about this but the pictures look like it’s a fuse reminiscent of the silk 650.


What that means is: regular, standard length in front of mast but shortened with an extra short spot on the tail. Previously this was only on the monoblock 650 and is an exciting upgrade if my deduction is correct.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
7 May 2026 9:15pm
I asked Greg for clarification on sizing vs the Paia 3.1m since that's the BRM I know best and he got back to me.
His response: "the low end of the 2.1m S3 is lighter than the 3.1m Paia, making it the 2.1m the closer match in range. Charts aside, that sounds consistent with my experiences."
So, it sounds like the new S3 sizes are a little more in alignment with traditional sizes.
Reply in Topic: New Armstrong Masts
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
6 May 2026 9:17pm
eppo said..
well if the UHA and Ma11 has any bearing on this I'd say it would be a strong possibility armstrong has got it right on the PMX mast. Might not be the fastest, might not be the most efficient but rider ease of use is always a priority with their design work lately. The layup and carbon used on the UHA especially has created such a stiff foil - it's crazy. Not cheap though

I'm not convinced the PMX will be for everyone . initially especially. You could see the immediate response from Oskar in his vid - this is a very different beast.


This all sounds accurate. In my experience the skinny masts aren't good at first impressions. They are such a shift in performance that they take some time to understand. People often confuse yaw for flex until you sort them out. There seems to be a shift in perception of Armstrong recently towards user friendliness though.
I'm intrigued by the price. My reasoning is that I have heard from brands that "No one will buy it at the required price to make it stiff." The result is that there is a pretty good offering of skinny masts out there that are lacking in stiffness. If the claim is true that they increased stiffness 10% while dropping to 11.8mm (how much does it taper up tho?) that would be an impressive accomplishment. Lots more skinny masts landing from brands this year and I am very interested in seeing who can capture the performance for the masses. I think the skinny masts offer such a huge upgrade to your foils that they are simply impossible to ignore if you are ready for the way they ride and can put the time in to understand them.
Reply in Topic: New Armstrong Masts
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
6 May 2026 10:44am
beached57 said..

BWalnut said..
I am so thrilled everyone is getting skinny masts now! It will be good to hear how it holds up with bigger rider evaluations. Did the current performance mast have any stiffness complaints? I'm not much in tune with Armstrong stuff.


from what i've seen in videos, the performance MKII is geared for heavier riders rather than the skinny X. at 90 kgs i've had no complaints with current 865 performance mast but will likely go to 795 MKII performance mast rather than X. I wing and foil drive, no parawing nor DW.


I hope you get the chance to try the X. 90kg seems to be the tipping point for a lot of gear choices and if you didn't have an issue with the current mast it sounds like the X should still be good for you since it's 10% stiffer. The carve would be the main benefit for you as a foil driver and winger but these skinny short chord masts can have a huge impact on your foils. The challenge for brands just seems to be which company can release a 12mm mast that is stiff enough for a majority of riders. Only one I know of so far and it sounds like Armstrong might have the #2 slot filled!
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
6 May 2026 3:25am
MidAtlanticFoil said..
Tacks look too easy:

www.instagram.com/reel/DX9puBYCY2M/?igsh=azlwMDdnenlhajJs


Supernatural.
Reply in Topic: New Armstrong Masts
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
5 May 2026 8:32pm
I am so thrilled everyone is getting skinny masts now! It will be good to hear how it holds up with bigger rider evaluations. Did the current performance mast have any stiffness complaints? I'm not much in tune with Armstrong stuff.
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
5 May 2026 8:29pm
ossy said..
Has anybody done a direct comparison with the v1? As a recent para winging convert currently using a 3.6m V1 pocket rocket, I am torn between buying another couple of cheaper V1's (lots coming up 2nd hand) or stumping out for the v2. any thoughts?


I think if you need bigger sizes, go v2 as I'd expect the shorter lines and easier packdown would be appreciated. I only flew 3.6 and larger a handful of times though. If you are going smaller, I can vouch that the 3m and 2.4m v1 were perfect for me other than long term durability concerns.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
5 May 2026 11:40am
flowstate said..
any clips out there showing how you douse this V3 BRM? that’s a lotta spaghetti to douse and stow


www.instagram.com/reel/DX8Cxi3iA4C/?igsh=MXNzaWdnaWdkOGJvMQ==


Looks smooth!
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
5 May 2026 6:57am
airsail said..
Sizing? I already have the 2.4 PP, so 4.3, 3.6, 2.4, can I skip the 3mtr?


The foilrat and ozone podcast (all sponsored) said there's not much overlap in sizes so skipping isn't recommended. In my experience though, from v1, I easily could have gone 3m down to 1.9m because when the 3m was totally maxed out the 2.4m didn't have much more in the tank. I get mine soon I hope and skipped the 3m so I'll let you know if I regret it.
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
4 May 2026 1:00pm
Youngbreezy said..Interesting, looks like they are being quite conservative with the wind ranges for the v2 if not perhaps a bit understated. I am getting a better wind range out of my current wings than what they are showing on their chart and I'm sure the PRv2 is much better than what Ive got currently.


I'm expecting just conservative. I think the published v1 wind range was off a bit and they may have tightened it on the new chart so it's not as useful as a v1 vs v2. I'm yet to hear any reviewer mention that the v2 wind range isn't as good (more comments about enhanced low end) or that top end has been sacrificed (although that slightly cupped trailing edge caught my eye). I should have mine in a couple weeks and will find out pretty quickly how the range feels for me vs the v1s.
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
4 May 2026 5:40am
It’s up on the Ozone website on the PRv2 page.
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
4 May 2026 3:30am
SlowlyButSurely said.. Ozone itself did horribly in their marketing strategy in my opinion.



Gotta agree with you on that. I was shocked when they announced the power pack and leaked the pocket rocket v2 was coming in an interview at the same time. PP was a hard no buy for me instantly.
One thing that I haven't quite spotted in early PRv2 reviews yet is if the top end and overall range has stayed the same? Here's the comparison chart and I wonder if the ranges here actually changed, or if they just tweaked and got more accurate? v1 on top and v2 on bottom.






Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
2 May 2026 1:54pm
That Hydro Gav review may have been the most enthusiastic I've ever seen him say something is the best.
Website is fully up and running:
ozonekites.com/wing/wings/pocket-rocket-v2/
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
2 May 2026 7:05am
Maybe a longshot but.... anyone happen to have experience with the Florence 110x and how it might compare to something like the UHA 670? It's been years since I rode that 110x as a winger and I'm looking for something high AR to add to my parawing quiver with a span between 900-1000 and these two are on my radar.
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
1 May 2026 1:49pm
-ZjvW
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
1 May 2026 1:09pm



Very innovative. It looks completely different from anything on the market.


BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
1 May 2026 12:39am
Urgull said..
Alright, I had the chance to sail it.
PROS[/b]
Much better upwind angle compared to the KANAHA
Incredibly lightweight material. Shockingly thing.
Stiffer ride (less vibration)
Even easier to stash and pack. It felt so so nice
Even thinner lines (how do they do it?)
CONS[/b]
Trickier to jibe
Sizes over 4.5 are even[/i] trickier to jibe
The material is so light that if the tip touches the water, the shape collapses

I haven’t tried it myself, but they say the 4.0 is really, really good.
The handle looks like a shovel? guess it’s a matter of tastes but I prefer simple stuff. But it pulls you upwind like a bull.


This is getting me super excited. I actually dreamed about a shovel like handle on this last night ?
What size did you try? Any standout traits vs other brands you've ridden?
Reply in Topic: Enduro 800 Review
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
29 Apr 2026 1:04am
I was curious about how close the upwind vs downwind speed actually was yesterday I checked it and it's almost exactly the same. Lap 1, 3, 5 are downwind and lap 2, 4, 6 are upwind.



Reply in Topic: Enduro 800 Review
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
27 Apr 2026 11:28pm
FranP said.. Interesting how the average speed ends up being quite similar between small and large foils.


I've always been surprised by how close the speed comparisons are as well. When I first started tracking and comparing average speeds between masts, years ago, I expected to see these large spreads but that wasn't the case. What it taught me is that all these seemingly small upgrades in efficiency actually matter and a few percentage points of gains can make or break my swell riding experience.


strekke said.. said to the dealer that an Enduro 800 would probably be "the one to rule them all". This was before the 800 was announced/in production


You're a foil oracle! It's definitely the best all-rounder for me from AFS.
BWalnut
BWalnut
WA
1160 posts
WA, 1160 posts
27 Apr 2026 11:12pm
I'm guessing his insta is showing a sneak peak: www.instagram.com/p/DXmn6eeE_1E/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅