After reading the discussions about narrow boards on this forum I have concluded that:
1) The performance of <20'' boards is significantly better than >22'' boards.
2) If you are not a beginner, it is not very difficult to get used to a narrow board. As soon as you get moving, balance is not a big deal.

So, why would you choose for a >20'' narrow board?

I would like to replace my 80l board for a narrow board. I am 92kg and also have a 70l board for sessions >18 knots. I was thinking about a board around 90l and 20'' width. I prefer manoeuvrability for waveriding above extreme light wind performance. Am I right about the dimensions to replace my 80l board?

I'm a newbie with the narrow boards but maybe you get >20 if you want the option to SUP foil as well?

Select to expand quote

RolfB said..
After reading the discussions about narrow boards on this forum I have concluded that:
1) The performance of 22'' boards.
2) If you are not a beginner, it is not very difficult to get used to a narrow board. As soon as you get moving, balance is not a big deal.

So, why would you choose for a >20'' narrow board?

I would like to replace my 80l board for a narrow board. I am 92kg and also have a 70l board for sessions >18 knots. I was thinking about a board around 90l and 20'' width. I prefer manoeuvrability for waveriding above extreme light wind performance. Am I right about the dimensions to replace my 80l board?

I think the only things you gain are the ability to water start easier and perhaps upwind performance because you can lean the board over further.

Select to expand quote

RolfB said..
After reading the discussions about narrow boards on this forum I have concluded that:
1) The performance of 22'' boards.
2) If you are not a beginner, it is not very difficult to get used to a narrow board. As soon as you get moving, balance is not a big deal.

So, why would you choose for a >20'' narrow board?

I would like to replace my 80l board for a narrow board. I am 92kg and also have a 70l board for sessions >18 knots. I was thinking about a board around 90l and 20'' width. I prefer manoeuvrability for waveriding above extreme light wind performance. Am I right about the dimensions to replace my 80l board?

Going a little bit wider allows the board to be significantly thinner, at the same volume, which is going to affect your maneuverability.

I carry my board upside down from the foil and 21" wide is comfortable for where the board hits my knee. 22" and wider hurts my knee when I carry the board and it bumps against my knee.

How long are you thinking?

Select to expand quote

BWalnut said..

RolfB said..
After reading the discussions about narrow boards on this forum I have concluded that:
1) The performance of 22'' boards.
2) If you are not a beginner, it is not very difficult to get used to a narrow board. As soon as you get moving, balance is not a big deal.

So, why would you choose for a >20'' narrow board?

I would like to replace my 80l board for a narrow board. I am 92kg and also have a 70l board for sessions >18 knots. I was thinking about a board around 90l and 20'' width. I prefer manoeuvrability for waveriding above extreme light wind performance. Am I right about the dimensions to replace my 80l board?

Going a little bit wider allows the board to be significantly thinner, at the same volume, which is going to affect your maneuverability.

I carry my board upside down from the foil and 21" wide is comfortable for where the board hits my knee. 22" and wider hurts my knee when I carry the board and it bumps against my knee.

How long are you thinking?

Around 6' I guess. In the discussions I have read some extra length is not a big issue because the tail is more behind the mast. The dimensions of the Gong Cruzader 90l look quite good for me. It is not too long 5'10" (178cm), pretty narrow: 20 1/16" (51cm) and not too thick: 5 11/16" 14,5cm. Would that be a good choice?

Select to expand quote

RolfB said..

BWalnut said..

RolfB said..
After reading the discussions about narrow boards on this forum I have concluded that:
1) The performance of 22'' boards.
2) If you are not a beginner, it is not very difficult to get used to a narrow board. As soon as you get moving, balance is not a big deal.

So, why would you choose for a >20'' narrow board?

I would like to replace my 80l board for a narrow board. I am 92kg and also have a 70l board for sessions >18 knots. I was thinking about a board around 90l and 20'' width. I prefer manoeuvrability for waveriding above extreme light wind performance. Am I right about the dimensions to replace my 80l board?

Going a little bit wider allows the board to be significantly thinner, at the same volume, which is going to affect your maneuverability.

I carry my board upside down from the foil and 21" wide is comfortable for where the board hits my knee. 22" and wider hurts my knee when I carry the board and it bumps against my knee.

How long are you thinking?

Around 6' I guess. In the discussions I have read some extra length is not a big issue because the tail is more behind the mast. The dimensions of the Gong Cruzader 90l look quite good for me. It is not too long 5'10" (178cm), pretty narrow: 20 1/16" (51cm) and not too thick: 5 11/16" 14,5cm. Would that be a good choice?

That's almost exactly the same dims as my new board so I'd argue that's a pretty good choice!

Awesome! Ah now I see, you're the one with the new Sunova Carver 5'10". The board looks great! That one and the Omen Flux 84l looks also interesting to me. I wish I could test the boards.

Select to expand quote

RolfB said..
Awesome! Ah now I see, you're the one with the new Sunova Carver 5'10". The board looks great! That one and the Omen Flux 84l looks also interesting to me. I wish I could test the boards.

I know a few people with the omen and it's good. I demo'd one of the small ones and it wasn't my style. I like the look and feel of the carver on land more. Hopefully first rides this week!