Select to expand quote
mathew said..sboardcrazy said..
I'm 5'6" and about 67kgs so my priorities are lightness and ease of use.
*confused* ... a cam'ed sail will be neither light or easy to use, compared to other styles of sail... such as the NCX you are comparing it to.
How do you define "lightness" and "ease of use" ?
Some people have their cammed sails set up really deep and powerful with tight cams that need a big jerk to get around. I suppose a lot of it is in the setup but I just want something that works out of the bag without a lot of muscling.
My older sails were very flat with not much power as I'd taken all the spacers out and let the battens off to help rotation. This one has a nice deep belly and still rotates. Once I get it set up properly after it's worn in it should be even better.

I'm looking forward to having a sail that has bottom end grunt but also stability and control.
I usually use mostly overdrives for GPS sailing.
I suppose ease of use to me is something that rotates without having to give it a great heave after gybing. Also something that doesn't have a gigantic luff tube to fill with water ( OD compared to reflexes).
At my weight I find getting the larger sails ( 7.5m - 7m) out of the water hard work. I'll have to suss out whether the luff will be an issue. So far it seems to drain well.
I want the stability/ wind range of cams but with easy rotation. I've had some of sails that have been a pain .You'd think they had rotated until 400m along the leg where you'd get a gust and they'd finally pop..

I've now tried it in pretty flatwater in a very patchy 12- 19kts .
As expected it has more grunt than the NCX and I'm looking forward to getting some decent wind to try it in bear aways.
I did notice the extra weight of the 3 cam doing gybes and I wore out quicker but that should go with more fitness as I use it more.
This are my impressions rather than a scientific "review' . I'm very happy with it..