Select to expand quote
PhilSWR said..
Back on track a little (although temped to try the Durex booties), is there really much difference (speed-wise) between a board like a 93 litre Futura and a Dedicated slalom board like a Falcon or Isonic of simular volume? Are we just talking a few knots, or way faster?
Cheers for any info.
Here is where I can be very sure. My mate who is the same size as me has a Futura 111. I have an Isonic 111. We sail together a lot at Sandy Point, mostly on fairly flatish water using the same 6.6m sizes and model sails.
The Futura is noticeable faster reaching and off the wind on flat water. A knot or two. No Doubt. Tried swapping sails boards and fins, and that is still the case.
Out of Gybes the Isonic is faster. Planes through better and accelerates quicker from low speed.
Up wind, the Isonic is usually quicker but not by much when both fully powered, more when a bit underpowered.
The Isonic is usually slightly quicker in open water waves and chop. Although the Futura is a bit easier to ride, the Isonic seems to skate over most chop and waves a little faster.
That said, the Futura is an exceptional Freerace board. Not sure if it would be the same comparison with a Falcon.
I noticed the same years ago with the Carve 99. It was seriously quick on really flat water off the wind when compared with dedicated slalom boards and my Isonic 87, which was better all round for everything else.
With both boards, the Futura and the Carve, I think it is because they have a narrower, pinny tail in comparison, and a hair more rocker in the back half. Both allow it to ride a bit higher on less wetted area when well powered up, but hurt it a bit in early planing and upwind.
Thats my experience, but remember it is mostly based to pretty flattish water conditions.
As it relates to the original question about ease of getting in the straps, the Isonic with the much wider tail and wider strap placement does require a more developed technique.