Good results, the logger matches the GW52 very closely. I don't think two GW52s would be any closer.
So here's the set up.
GW52 in an H20tek pouch and the looger in a midi paqua.

And here's the display in GPSResults, from the resultant files.

The purple/pink lines are the accuracy data, I've never used this before, but the ubx file doesn't display SDoP.
Top is logger bottom GW52.
And here's the text read out for both 2sec results.
GW52
2s:
time,,,,,,,,,,, m ,,,,,[knots] accuracy
13:43:04, 54.0, 52.499, +/-0.139
13:48:00, 48.9, 47.539, +/-0.124
13:45:50, 40.3, 39.132, +/-0.215
13:38:24, 39.0, 37.91,1 +/-0.129
13:40:46, 31.9, 31.012, +/-0.172
13:39:09, 31.2, 30.320, +/-0.154
13:49:43, 30.7, 29.875, +/-0.042
13:36:20, 30.6, 29.758, +/-0.198
13:34:17, 29.7, 28.821, +/-0.086
13:37:06, 29.6, 28.753, +/-0.219
13:35:39, 27.6, 26.778, +/-0.122
13:44:20, 26.8, 26.022, +/-0.153
13:43:54, 22.1, 21.472, +/-0.090
13:33:06, 11.2, 10.887, +/-0.081
13:33:40, 10.7, 10.421, +/-0.079
13:39:58, 7.3, 7.072, +/-0.186
13:40:00, 7.2, 7.023, +/-0.175
13:46:16, 6.8, 6.601, +/-0.109
13:33:12, 6.3, 6.146, +/-0.075
13:51:30, 4.4, 4.236, +/-0.067
13:33:44, 3.7 ,3.583, +/-0.098
13:45:13, 3.2, 3.089, +/-0.275
13:40:03, 2.3, 2.263, +/-0.127
13:41:20, 1.2, 1.176, +/-0.084
13:46:09, 1.1, 1.108, +/-0.062
average[2]: 92.635km/h 50.019knots
average[3]: 85.914km/h 46.390knots
average[5]: 77.077km/h 41.618knots
Logger/M8N 2s
13:43:22, 54.0, 52.510,+/-0.133
13:48:18, 48.9, 47.533,+/-0.151
13:46:07, 40.2, 39.078,+/-0.179
13:38:43, 39.0, 37.941,+/-0.146
13:41:04, 31.8, 30.955,+/-0.153
13:39:27, 31.2, 30.322,+/-0.157
13:50:01, 30.7, 29.876,+/-0.169
13:36:38, 30.6, 29.727,+/-0.151
13:34:35, 29.7, 28.827,+/-0.138
13:37:24, 29.7, 28.824,+/-0.145
13:44:38, 26.8, 26.078,+/-0.149
13:44:12, 22.0, 21.422,+/-0.164
13:33:24, 11.2, 10.866,+/-0.171
13:33:58, 10.7, 10.425,+/-0.152
13:44:23, 7.3, 7.110,+/-0.149
13:40:16, 7.3, 7.059,+/-0.171
13:40:18, 7.2, 6.959,+/-0.163
13:46:34, 6.8, 6.590,+/-0.160
13:33:17, 6.6, 6.384,+/-0.165
13:33:30, 6.3, 6.15,2+/-0.160
13:33:13, 5.7, 5.563,+/-0.162
13:51:48, 4.4, 4.262,+/-0.156
13:34:02, 3.7, 3.579,+/-0.157
13:45:31, 2.5, 2.454,+/-0.186
13:40:21, 2.3, 2.276,+/-0.144
average[2]: 92.640km/h 50.022knots
average[3]: 85.884km/h 46.374knots
average[5]: 77.049km/h 41.603knots
So the GW52's worst accuracy is +/- 0.215 and the logger is +/- 0.186. I'm not sure what that means though as the calculations are different. It's interesting just how close they are, the discrepancy is at low speed where the GW52 has it's best results, contrary to what locosys says. And the open-logger is much more consistent varying from 0.133 to 0.186, whereas the GW52 goes as low as 0.042 and up to 0.215.