Select to expand quote
Roo said..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Interested to see what the satellite count and hdop were for the devices, could you check them Decrepit and post the details. Just interested to see if different phones have similar values.
Roo
OK, here's the numbers I got today, actually remembered to "start recording"
realspeed results.
GW52 2/6/15
2s 31.292, (SDOP .27 - .35 HDOP .8 sats 10), 30.558, 30.034,
5x10 28.32
alpha 16.959, 16.473, 16.429
NM 19.543
Hr 14.17
dist 75.34
GT 31
2s 31.257, (SDOP .272, HDOP .8, sats 10), 30.445, 29.882
5x10 29.29
alpha 20.265, 19.788, 19.646
NM 19.57
Hr 13.87
dist 74.15
gps logit
2s 31.364, (HDOP .2 sats 16, 10, 10.), 30.513, 30.271, 29.42,
5x10 29.295
alpha 20.26, 19.939, 19.601
NM 19.569
Hr 13.98
dist 76.190
And here' what the phone itself says.
2s 31,364, 30.635, 30.392, 29.663
5x10 29.312
alpha, 20.325, 19.960, 19.601
NM 19.45
1 Hr 13.476
dist 67.3km ? not sure about this one.
(Interesting that realspeed doesn't like proccessing GW52 alphas.)
The logits tracks were still more jagged than the other two, and the sat number varied more, on the 3 data points used for two second, it went from 16 to 10.
max sats in the file is 23, but it doesn't seem to hold that number for long. I think the signal strength for the Russian sats is much lower than the American ones. Could it be that the russian sats dropping in and out, causes the jaggedness?
It doesn't seem to affect the results though!