Select to expand quote
fangman said..
I begun pondering a big Delta fin for my big board with Decrepit the other day and I need to pick the brains of those who now a lot more about aerodynamics/hydrodynamics than I do.. Question - I notice the MUF Delta fins are the classic Mirage jet fighter straight leading edge shape. However Concorde had a concave curve leading edge. Whats the advantage of a straight leading edge in terms of lift/drag, if there indeed is one?
The Concorde's delta wing like the mirage while very efficient at high speeds, suffers from problems with low speed handling. Most aircraft have wings that are modifiable in flight, to improve low speed handling, usually large flaps and leading edge slots, these devices usually require a tailplane to handle the different trimming forces created by these devices. The Concorde had no leading devices and only has very limited flaps, but it is able to make use of phenomenon called vortex lift at low speed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_liftThat is my understanding of why the Concorde's wing is shaped as it is, so if runway length was unlimited, a much simpler delta wind shape would have been used. The F-18 hornet's' leading edge chines also make use of the vortex lift