Back to top

adding weight

Created by pirrad pirrad  > 9 months ago, 16 Oct 2009
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
pirrad
pirrad

SA

850 posts

16 Oct 2009 2:42pm
Don't you just love the variables involved in this sport. ,rig selection, setup,wind conditions,water conditions ,ability, personal ambitions just to generalize.Modern technology sees boards weighing in at peanuts,people making there own foot straps to save a fiew grams and then the option is there to put on a weight jacket.??my question is ,what are the disadvantages of a heavy board for -sailing fast-[speed] i weigh 95 kg ,TIGA 268[9.5kg] ,6.6-5.0 koncept,current PB 34.5 knts[6.5gtx deceased] Would i sail faster on a board that is 5kg lighter?and then maybe faster again with weight jacket?
choco
choco

SA

4177 posts

16 Oct 2009 2:59pm
Upgrade your board to a newer lighter slalom shape and you will go faster.
Pointman
Pointman

WA

437 posts

16 Oct 2009 2:27pm
It isn't just the weight that will make you go quicker pirrad (or less of it), it's the shape of the modern slalom boards. The shorter wider style boards are a lot more forgiving to ride in chop than the old skool long narrow gunny boards.

Being easier to sail means you're more likely to push harder and go faster in less than ideal conditions.
Haircut
Haircut

QLD

6491 posts

16 Oct 2009 4:45pm
i readed somewhere that tall fat folk + light gear + big winds = fast
choco
choco

SA

4177 posts

16 Oct 2009 5:27pm
Select to expand quote
Haircut said...

i readed somewhere that tall fat folk + light gear + big winds = fast FOOD


Haircut
Haircut

QLD

6491 posts

16 Oct 2009 5:19pm
that too
NotWal
NotWal

QLD

7435 posts

16 Oct 2009 5:25pm
Select to expand quote
Pointman said...

It isn't just the weight that will make you go quicker pirrad (or less of it), it's the shape of the modern slalom boards. The shorter wider style boards are a lot more forgiving to ride in chop than the old skool long narrow gunny boards.

Being easier to sail means you're more likely to push harder and go faster in less than ideal conditions.


I think the narrower boards are better through chop. I'd be interested to know what others think.
Gestalt
Gestalt

QLD

14722 posts

16 Oct 2009 5:31pm
^ my understanidng is that this is true.

aren't CA boards narrower than most?
pirrad
pirrad

SA

850 posts

16 Oct 2009 6:23pm
[tiga 90ltr]My next board up is a carve 121.I'd say i feel much more comfortable pushing the limits on the tiga.the flex in those old boards makes them more forgiving to i also believe.I'M GOING TO HAVE TO TRY A NEWER TYPE BOARD AND SEE FOR MYSELF.
choco
choco

SA

4177 posts

16 Oct 2009 7:02pm
It's well worth demoing a newer slalom board as has already been stated alot easier to ride,if you can get a chance try the Starboard isonics or Tabou Manta's.
Do you have any good flat water spots around Pirie?
sandman
sandman

WA

432 posts

16 Oct 2009 5:56pm
heavy board will have the same top end as a light one assuming the shape flex etc is the same. Difference is that the light one will accelerate up onto the plane quicker.

Weight jacket will allow you to hold down a larger sail, the higher the weight up your body the better (as you can get more leverage over the sail). Technically it would effect your early planing too but if you can hold down a bigger sail then you would negate this fact somewhat.

Of course the fastest most efficient hull shape would not be the fastest if it is so tricky/scary to sail you cant push it to it's limit
pirrad
pirrad

SA

850 posts

16 Oct 2009 9:06pm
CHOCO Got a good spot down the road ,subject to tide and wind direction, not a long run though,joined the 30 knt club there on a 148ltr techno2-8mtr-gtx[flat as rankins]done my pb there over the flats around channel[short chop]

Did read in another post about a reputable speed sailor saying that weight upsets his balance...[cant find the link now but i read somewhere that there are benefits in keeping the weight down low,sure it was a WINDSURF mag article]

Makes me wonder about the LEVERAGE factor,given the physics of the set up,harness ,mast base pressure= light feet.Upper body strength - technique are areas i still need to work on,and the size of your #uts helps to hey .
Gestalt
Gestalt

QLD

14722 posts

16 Oct 2009 8:44pm
here ya go pirrad,

everything you need to know. hours of brilliant information.

carbonsugar.com/
choco
choco

SA

4177 posts

16 Oct 2009 9:42pm
Only just started using a weight jacket this week and have had no problems with balance but i'm only using 3kg.It has really helped in improving my stance and being able to keep the hammer down while in the big gusts well worth buying one and if you don't like it makes a good impact/pfd.
Sailed 100k's this week wearing it with no probs,wont sail without it if it's blowing over 25knts from now on.
Do you have any pics of the speed spots you sail?
Pointman
Pointman

WA

437 posts

17 Oct 2009 3:37pm
Select to expand quote
NotWal said...

Pointman said...

It isn't just the weight that will make you go quicker pirrad (or less of it), it's the shape of the modern slalom boards. The shorter wider style boards are a lot more forgiving to ride in chop than the old skool long narrow gunny boards.

Being easier to sail means you're more likely to push harder and go faster in less than ideal conditions.


I think the narrower boards are better through chop. I'd be interested to know what others think.


All other things being equal I agree.

I was comparing the new style wide boards to the old skool narrow boards, which tended to have thick, blocky, razor-sharp rails. Fast if you knew what you were doing, but quite technical to sail and easy to trip a rail.

RumChaser
RumChaser

TAS

629 posts

17 Oct 2009 8:15pm
I had a go at a newer, wide board that a mate had and in comparing it to my older board that was just about the same capacity, I found the older, narrower and longer board got on the plane earlier, was easier to turn and handled the chop better. Is this just that I was more used to my board or is something amiss????
Gestalt
Gestalt

QLD

14722 posts

17 Oct 2009 7:28pm
personally i'd go wide and short anyday of the week, i much prefer what they offer.

from mucking around with different length boards i think there is a magic length though. approx 235-240 suits my weight for a average volume board.
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site