Select to expand quote
Peter Ciesa said.. Chris 249 said..
/\
It's apparently not actually very easy to televise kites. If you zoom out to show the kite, you can't see the sailor. If you zoom in to see the sailor, you can't see the kite. Actually talking to sports photogs about this stuff gives an interesting perspective.
Chris I suggest you watch the youtube HydroFoil Pro Tour channel video's..... It may debunk your view-able status for racing????
Here's a guy with a second generation (I believe or could be current?) DJI Phantom 3 (or 4) who has filmed these races superbly IMHO. The commentator adds color (really cracks me up sometimes) to each race. The HydroFoil races were post processed but imagine with a couple drones and a live connection (a reality with Phantom 4 models) this is TV real-time broadcast-able. BTW a Phantom 4 can push upwind in 20+ knots.
I'm a windsurfer only and only wish an enterprising soul or souls could do the same for Formula or PWA/slalom type events with drones........
Cheers Peter
ps - Olympic sailing televised was again piss poor as has been every other Olympics.
pss - best vision was Fiji 7's celebration after winning, 2nd best was Pentathlon winner, Chloe Esposito - so proud of her dad:-)
Sorry Peter, but that seems to confirm that all you see of the sailor is a minute black dot, a couple of mm high, from hundreds of metres away. You or I might like it, but if we look at the sports that attract higher ratings it seems that they are very different to watch.
Here's the list of cumulative TV ratings from the 2008 Games. I'm using them because the 2012 Games report didn't provide as much detail about separate disciplines.
Athletics 206 hours broadcast / 65 mill spectators each minute
Road cycling 121 / 23.8
Swimming 120 hours broadcast/ 58.8 mill spectators each minute
Artistic gymnastics 106 / 53.3
Volleyball 103 / 38.5
Triathlon 68 /. 19.4
Beach volleyball 59 / 23.6
Rhythmic gymnastics 49/ 30.4
MTB 45 / 16.4
BMX 44 / 23.2
Table tennis 41 / 40.8
Track cycling 37/32.8
Diving 31 / 43.5
Rowing 24 / 40.8
Water polo 24 / 17.4
Sprint (flat water) kayak/canoe – 24 / 32.4
Slalom (whitewater) canoe – 22 / 22.3
Sync Swimming 17 / 25.7
Shooting 12 /28
Trampolining 11 / 41.6
Sailing – 11 / 24.5
These show that "boring" rowing and paddling in a straight line on a flat lake outrated "extreme" images like the kayaks bouncing and zig-zagging down rocky rapids, and the 49ers crashing at 25+ knots in the extreme last race. Road cycling, with a bunch of guys riding pretty much in a straight line in a bunch, outrated "extreme" MTBs and BMXs bouncing over jumps and rocks, and the faster track cycling on 42 degree banks. In the pool. people swimming in a straight line at about 6 knots rates its socks off, and people twisting and tumbling in an amazing way as they dive down 10m or so doesn't rate that well.
So the actual stats seem to show that "extreme" sports don't rate well - what really counts is being able to get in close and see things like the athletes close-up and see who is winning. Given that, kiting or windsurfing may always be problematic.
One thing I find interesting is that (AFAIK) no one from sailing has ever sat down and discussed with the TV companies what makes for good viewing. When you talk to professional photographers and art directors you find that they often have completely different ideas than many sailors do.