Select to expand quote
mrrt said...
Wow, I can't believe any of you seriously want to sail those horrible old Wallys or their dreadful triangle sails.
So big and heavy and laterally unstable and knee and shin bruising and those ridiculously long booms...
The day we got rid of our last Wally and One Design boards, not to mention the big Tyronsea and Falcon boards and replaced them all with JP NewSchool 160 and 180 Funster boards was a glorious day indeed for our volunteer windsurfing camp.
Those horrible aircraft carriers were responsible for more people being turned off the sport than anything else as I've opined in the past. I remember cracking the front windshield of my family's Tarago trying to fit one inside the people mover.
The number of friends and family who are now inspired to take up the sport by learning on our modern lightweight wide, fast, soft-deck boards is so much more encouraging.
The best use I've found for all the old huge triangle sails is cutting a few down to make tiny little kiddie rigs for my 4 year old.
Anyway, m2c
I can't believe that you can't see that a bunch of pretty knowledgeable sailors (including national and world wavesailing champs and Olympians) would be sailing the old boards if they didn't work well.

The Wally 6m sail weighs just under 2k - compare that to a "light" modern sail and you see that any claim that they are heavy is simply not justified. Yes, the CoE does wander around but that's what the muscles in your back hand are for! Yes, in WA conditions such sails can become difficult, but over here in the east we regularly sail in under 8-12 knots and in those conditions, many of us find longboards to be faster, more sensitive, and more fun.
Your opinion that they turned people off the sport is not logical, since the sport was about 12 times as big when people sailed stuff like Wallies as it is today. Yes, other sports have sagged in popularity but nothing like as much as windsurfing so it's obvious that we are doing something wrong. Guys like Svein Rasmussen have accepted that now.
The plain and simple facts are that most people in most areas normally face light winds. Unless the wind is steady and 8-12 knots or more, a modern short and wide board is much slower than an old longboard*. Why spend more on a new board just to go much slower and drag around a heavier rig designed for heavier winds?
A couple of years back, for example, a Wally and Raceboard turned up at the North Sails race in Victoria in about 8 knots of wind. In a 10 lap race over a reaching course, the Wally won, about 2 laps ahead of the first wide board, which was carrying a much bigger, heavier and more expensive rig.
Either all the Victorian shortboard sailers are bad sailors - which they are definitely NOT - or the longboard was simply faster as well as having a lighter, simpler rig and a tougher and cheaper hull. That's just one example of what happens in a typical summer's day outside WA.
Please stop being so arrogant about this. We accept that you choose the board that works for your conditions, so please accept that we know what works for us in the conditions in which we sail these boards. Stop insulting people like Jessica Crisp (Aloha Classic winner and women's world cup wavesailing champ) and other national wavesailing champs (Warren Holder, Rohan Cudmore) by saying that they don't know what to sail for fun.
PS - sorry, but I really cannot believe that anyone can blame the board for the fact that a Tarago was damaged when a Wally was shoved into it. What next, blame a Funster for the fact that you can't use it as a ramp when loading barrows of bricks?

* top end FW or slalom gear will bring the wind limit down, but they still have significant limitations as well as great plus points.