Select to expand quote
WindmanV said..
Hello, Steve,
The current-model iLoad was reduced in engine power to 100kW/343 Nm torque. It has 4.3 cub. m of load space and costs $34490.
The new engine rating was introduced in MY 2013 (to the best of my knowledge). The old engine rating was 125kW/392 Nm torque. Both the old and the new engines were 2.5 L in size. The old engine had a variable-geometry turbo, whilst the new engine has a single-stage turbo.
Current-model VW T5?s have different engine ratings, but the equivalent to the iLoad in terms of power is a 2.0 L engine, has 103kW/340Nm torque. It has 5.8 cub. m of load space and costs $37990.
All of the above specs were taken from ?Delivery? magazine, past and present issues, but you can check the specs on both manufacturer?s web-sites.
In making your decision, you might also consider: are dealers readily to hand (particularly if you travel North from Perth), cost of scheduled servicing, frequency of servicing, warranty period and body rust warranty period.
You will find that the cleaner the engine (in terms of exhaust emissions), the more expensive the oil used in the engine. You might care to go onto the Castrol website to see what oils they recommend for both vehicles, then get prices from the Supercheap website, but prices of $50 (or more) for 5 L of oil are pretty common.
Hope this helps.
It's actually only the Manual that has the lower power engine, the auto gets 125kw/440Nm, seems like a weird move? I guess maybe most private consumers buy the auto where power specs etc matter. The manual 100kw version is probably mostly bought buy fleets like toll etc so they just want the cheapest/best fuel econ.
Don't own either but have been in both the iload/trans plenty of times, both pretty good vans. iload wins on price, vw probably wins on hipster cred status.